1 Question & 1 Round Diamond
- Thread starter markymark
- Start date
- Status
Mara
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2002
- Messages
- 31,003
The new IS image looks better than the old IMO. More crisp with reds as opposed to pinkish tint. Still a really lovely stone for the price.
Valeria...my IS image is a amateur's good luck! As I mentioned in my IS thread, it didn't look QUITE so good under the scope in reality. I think the picture lent some extra red or similar. But that's okay...it's a cool picture.
Don't worry--I will switch it out when I get my Regent back and can take a decent shot.
Valeria...my IS image is a amateur's good luck! As I mentioned in my IS thread, it didn't look QUITE so good under the scope in reality. I think the picture lent some extra red or similar. But that's okay...it's a cool picture.
aljdewey
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2002
- Messages
- 9,170
OOOOOOOoooooooo....glad to see it's one of Linda's stone's your considering! She does an AWESOME job!
Linda (and everyone), just a quick "disclaimer" on my comments with the ideal scope images. My comments in should in NO way be construed to be critical of this diamond's quality....it's looks to be a BEAUTIFUL diamond!
My only point was that it's tough to *compare* images when they aren't taken with the same type of light source, that's all.
I made the mistake of thinking that the stone with the image represented by the white background wasn't as strong a performer as the stone with pink background. I wondered why, because the numbers on the two stones I looked at where damn near identical so why the big difference in IS images?
Got into a discussion with a few experts about this and it was astutely pointed out to me that comparison of light images is not particularly useful when the lighting conditions vary as they do here.
Linda (and everyone), just a quick "disclaimer" on my comments with the ideal scope images. My comments in should in NO way be construed to be critical of this diamond's quality....it's looks to be a BEAUTIFUL diamond!
My only point was that it's tough to *compare* images when they aren't taken with the same type of light source, that's all.
I made the mistake of thinking that the stone with the image represented by the white background wasn't as strong a performer as the stone with pink background. I wondered why, because the numbers on the two stones I looked at where damn near identical so why the big difference in IS images?
Got into a discussion with a few experts about this and it was astutely pointed out to me that comparison of light images is not particularly useful when the lighting conditions vary as they do here.
- Status
Did You Miss The Throwback Thursdays For April 2024?
Did You Miss The Throwback Thursdays For April 2024? - 04/25
300x240.png)