After going through a ton of threads here and elsewhere on princess cut stones, it looks like my budget will allow for a 1.0, possibily up to a 1.25ct (if business continues as normal) Solasfera or ACA. I understand that it's kind of an apples & oranges thing, but ultimately I can purchase only one stone.
I did read through this thread: [URL='https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/solasfera-vs-wf-aca-please-help-me-decide.158985/']https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/solasfera-vs-wf-aca-please-help-me-decide.158985/[/URL] However, the original poster is looking for a round at approximately 0.66ct, so I'm not sure the following quote applies to a princess cut that's a bit bigger:
"The solasfera will have more, faster, smaller twinkles of bright white light, the ACA will have comparatively fewer, slower, bolder flashes. Facets are already small (and thus predisposed to twinkly white light return) simply because of the stone size you are considering, I'd want as few facets that are as large as possible to provide some balance, but you might prefer to see lots of white twinkle and would love something like the Solasfera in this size."
In theory, I'd lean toward the Solasfera's "twinkles" to the ACA's "bolder flashes", and because from what I understand, the Solasfera stones have smaller tables, which might make the stone less flat compared to the round stones. (Is that correct?) However, the above quote makes me concerned about getting one and I'm not sure whether the stones I'm looking at would also run into the issue cited above because it has smaller facets.
Any guidance on this issue would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Rob
I did read through this thread: [URL='https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/solasfera-vs-wf-aca-please-help-me-decide.158985/']https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/solasfera-vs-wf-aca-please-help-me-decide.158985/[/URL] However, the original poster is looking for a round at approximately 0.66ct, so I'm not sure the following quote applies to a princess cut that's a bit bigger:
"The solasfera will have more, faster, smaller twinkles of bright white light, the ACA will have comparatively fewer, slower, bolder flashes. Facets are already small (and thus predisposed to twinkly white light return) simply because of the stone size you are considering, I'd want as few facets that are as large as possible to provide some balance, but you might prefer to see lots of white twinkle and would love something like the Solasfera in this size."
In theory, I'd lean toward the Solasfera's "twinkles" to the ACA's "bolder flashes", and because from what I understand, the Solasfera stones have smaller tables, which might make the stone less flat compared to the round stones. (Is that correct?) However, the above quote makes me concerned about getting one and I'm not sure whether the stones I'm looking at would also run into the issue cited above because it has smaller facets.
Any guidance on this issue would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Rob