Hi all,
Sorry, this will be abit of a spiel so please bear with me!
I recently purchased a stone off a popular vendor with a good feedback rating. Others on PS have purchased off this vendor and had mixed results, some have been happy and others have returned their items (usually because the colour wasn't what they expected based on the auction pictures).
I thought I would give this vendor a go and purchased a reasonably inexpensive stone. Received the stone and unfortunately the stone was a completely different colour to the auction pictures (stone was a magenta pink/purple in the pictures with excellent saturation and a brown/grape purple with poor saturation IRL).
I returned the stone as per the vendor's return policy, but the vendor never received it. Unfortunately NZ only has two postage options-international air post which is fairly inexpensive (jewellery/stones are not covered) or international courier which is about 7x the price of international air. I usually take the risk and send my stones back via standard post (most are worth less than $100 USD) and so far all the vendors I have returned stones to have received them so I was a wee bit surprised that the vendor hadn't received the item (as we are pretty close to Asia, stones usually take 3-5 days to arrive).
I posted neutral feedback on the vendor commenting on the fact that the stone colour was completely different to the pictures in the auction and the seller has been in contact offering to give me a refund if I change my feedback (they have very few neutral/negative feedbacks).
My question is would you 'give in' to bribery and retract the feedback if it meant getting your money back? I don't think a full refund would sit well with me as the vendor does not have the stone, but at the same time if the colours were accurate I would not have purchased the stone and therefore would not have had to return it.
I did note that in one of the other neutral feedbacks, the vendor mentioned that they had offered the purchaser a refund even though they had not received the stone. The purchaser then posted that they had proof the stone was delivered to the vendor. The reality is I only have the vendor's word that they haven't received the stone (I am fairly certain they are being truthful but you never know).
Your advice/opinions would be appreciated
Sorry, this will be abit of a spiel so please bear with me!
I recently purchased a stone off a popular vendor with a good feedback rating. Others on PS have purchased off this vendor and had mixed results, some have been happy and others have returned their items (usually because the colour wasn't what they expected based on the auction pictures).
I thought I would give this vendor a go and purchased a reasonably inexpensive stone. Received the stone and unfortunately the stone was a completely different colour to the auction pictures (stone was a magenta pink/purple in the pictures with excellent saturation and a brown/grape purple with poor saturation IRL).
I returned the stone as per the vendor's return policy, but the vendor never received it. Unfortunately NZ only has two postage options-international air post which is fairly inexpensive (jewellery/stones are not covered) or international courier which is about 7x the price of international air. I usually take the risk and send my stones back via standard post (most are worth less than $100 USD) and so far all the vendors I have returned stones to have received them so I was a wee bit surprised that the vendor hadn't received the item (as we are pretty close to Asia, stones usually take 3-5 days to arrive).
I posted neutral feedback on the vendor commenting on the fact that the stone colour was completely different to the pictures in the auction and the seller has been in contact offering to give me a refund if I change my feedback (they have very few neutral/negative feedbacks).
My question is would you 'give in' to bribery and retract the feedback if it meant getting your money back? I don't think a full refund would sit well with me as the vendor does not have the stone, but at the same time if the colours were accurate I would not have purchased the stone and therefore would not have had to return it.
I did note that in one of the other neutral feedbacks, the vendor mentioned that they had offered the purchaser a refund even though they had not received the stone. The purchaser then posted that they had proof the stone was delivered to the vendor. The reality is I only have the vendor's word that they haven't received the stone (I am fairly certain they are being truthful but you never know).
Your advice/opinions would be appreciated