- Joined
- Oct 11, 2011
- Messages
- 6,185
Nah, don't go. Not worth the trouble. I will gladly travel for someone I like, even if it is inconvenient, but if I don't even LIKE the person? Even if it is family? No way. I don't think family counts just because they are related - I think they only count if you actually have a positive familial relationship with them. Tell FIL to take a hike.
And if ten years from now your kids want to know more about those members of the family, THEY can reach out. (I never understand this "for the kids" argument. I also see it in advice columns as "Dear so-and-so, I cut off my sexually abusive father because of obvious reasons, now I have kids and want to know my family's medical history. Should I reach out to him?" EFF NO, MORON, etc. That's an extreme example, but I think it holds out even in less-extreme cases.)
We have this rule too. Our couples' counselor has said it's the best way to maintain harmony with the extended families (I had the rule before that, but the fiance wouldn't really listen to it until the counselor agreed, hah).
If you have little to no interaction with them but are the kind of people who decline and send a gift, it is entirely possible they knew you'd do that and were counting on the gift. idk, it always strikes me as gift-grabby to invite people you don't know or don't like to an event where gifts are standard. So in this instance I just wouldn't send a gift, even. I do for people I LIKE if I have to decline, but if I am kind of confused as to why I was even invited in the first place, no.
If you decide to send a gift, I'd make it a small one, like $25ish. And I wouldn't expect a thank-you note, not even a year later.
And if ten years from now your kids want to know more about those members of the family, THEY can reach out. (I never understand this "for the kids" argument. I also see it in advice columns as "Dear so-and-so, I cut off my sexually abusive father because of obvious reasons, now I have kids and want to know my family's medical history. Should I reach out to him?" EFF NO, MORON, etc. That's an extreme example, but I think it holds out even in less-extreme cases.)
rubyshoes|1364570982|3415995 said:pregcurious|1364570534|3415988 said:It may be best for him to go by himself. I know people will feel differently about this, but my husband and I have an agreement that we're responsible for managing our own families.
OOH! My DH and I have this rule too and most people think we're crazy but it works for us. Yeah, I think Sarahbear DH could go if he so wishes/wants to make dad happy but no need to put Sarahbear & kids through what will likely be a very awkward and inconvenient event.
We have this rule too. Our couples' counselor has said it's the best way to maintain harmony with the extended families (I had the rule before that, but the fiance wouldn't really listen to it until the counselor agreed, hah).
mrs jam|1364577086|3416049 said:Some of the strong reactions here leave me confused. What is so horrible about receiving a wedding invite from a couple that you have little to no interaction with??? Half of the wedding invites I have received are from couples that I don't know very well. Big freaking deal. It's not that difficult to exercise common courtesy, decline nicely, and send a gift.
If you have little to no interaction with them but are the kind of people who decline and send a gift, it is entirely possible they knew you'd do that and were counting on the gift. idk, it always strikes me as gift-grabby to invite people you don't know or don't like to an event where gifts are standard. So in this instance I just wouldn't send a gift, even. I do for people I LIKE if I have to decline, but if I am kind of confused as to why I was even invited in the first place, no.
If you decide to send a gift, I'd make it a small one, like $25ish. And I wouldn't expect a thank-you note, not even a year later.