Would this be eye-clean?

[mnturco]

Considering this VS2, based on these photos, is it possible to tell if this would be eye-clean?

 

[meely]

Not for me

 

[SparklenHue123]

I am no expert but I would say no . I'm sorry!

 

[ivandjaw]

Not eye clean for me, but if you can have the seller to take 360 pictures using 10x or 40x magnification with possibly a specialized equipment instead of a blurry (most probably from mobile phone) photos, it will be better.

 

[skypie]

The inclusion at 2:30 looks like it would be visible to me without magnification.

 

[mnturco]

Thank you all. I've requested better photos from the seller, Brilliant Earth, but based on these initial images and your responses I think I will pursue some other options.

 

[mnturco]

BE states these images are under a 20x loupe and the stone would appear eye clean under any light. Not sure I believe that : /

 

[ringo865]

What are the angles and stats? Can they get you an ASET and/or idealscope? Those pictures are not doing that stone any favors.

 

[mnturco]

I know, the photos definitely leave a lot to be desired, I'm bumming because I was leaning towards this stone until I saw these photos today. BE says they will provide ASET images. Stats: .94 carat, H color, VS2, Triple Excellent, Table: 56%, Depth: 61.5%, Crown: 33.2, Pavilion: 41

 

[absolutme77]

I don’t think so either. Can you also find out what the grading inclusions are? They may be blurry photos or the diamond may either have fluorescence or clouds making it appear that way.