Which would you choose?

[planet_jp]

And why? Would you eliminate any of these based on the numbers and images?

Thanks so much for sharing your knowledge!

http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/Compare_Diamonds.aspx?idnos=2262618,2262617,2262621#http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/Compare_Diamonds.aspx?idnos=2262618,2262617,2262621#

 

[Stephan]

I would NEVER buy a round diamond with a depth above 62%.
Perhaps I would, but I would never think it is ideal, even if AGS thinks it is.

 

[planet_jp]

Thanks, Stephan. How does a depth greater than 62% affect performance? I''m trying to learn.

 

[Stephan]

Everybody here will tell you it''s fine as long as it is an AGS 000.
In my opinion, fire, spread and sometimes scintillation are affected by a borderline depth.

 

[tyty333]

Number 3 would be my choice. 62% is the normal cut off for depth that I use. You lose face up size when
going too deep. (#3 is the biggest of the 3). However, from looking at all the reports all the stones look like they should be
very pretty stones. #3 makes the most sense to me (make sure it is eye-clean to your standards).

 

[Stephan]

If you go for nr 3 as tyty smartly advised, ask WF if the stone is eye clean and if the clouds don''t make the diamond look dull.