ame|1410354334|3748310 said:I like the original #2 actually. I like the width because it kind of echoes the width of the metal "channel" on either side of your diamond channels. I also like how the stones are set because they're more secure.
One thought would be a narrow channel set, since your shank is channel set. But if you don't want the same type of band, I understand that.
Calliecake|1410356255|3748329 said:I'd choose the three pointer. It looks beautiful with your engagement ring and I think it would look very pretty all on its own. It's always nice to have a wedding band that looks great on its own for those times you don't want to wear your engagement ring.
motownmama|1410356491|3748330 said:LOVE your ER!!! You don't want to use princess cuts for your WB?
msop04|1410357148|3748336 said:Very pretty ering, OP! Personally, I like #3 with the 3 pointers... it has a bit more presence and isn't overpowered by your ering. It is the largest, so it would be the best of the three to be a stand along ring, if needed.
Calliecake|1410378277|3748572 said:Endless Summer, The proportions of the 3 pointers look perfect with you engagement ring. I also liked the two pointer but for some reason I think the 3 pointers look better. I also like the 3 pointers as a stand alone wedding band better. It's a win-win!
I can feel your pain. It seems like such a simple decision, then you try different sizes on and your totally confused. Just take your time and pick what you think you'll stay in love with. If you are really torn don't think about it for a few days and then go back and look again.
endless_summer said:...I was wondering, which was whether the larger shared prong took away from or outdid my e-ring. The 3 pointers are much more substantial - it was amazing how much of a difference I could see between 2 pointers and 2.5 pointers, and even moreso between 2 pointers and 3 pointers
Calliecake|1410477280|3749335 said:Taking your time with your decision is always the safest bet. Please come back and let us know your final decision.
SandyinAnaheim|1410483659|3749413 said:endless_summer said:...I was wondering, which was whether the larger shared prong took away from or outdid my e-ring. The 3 pointers are much more substantial - it was amazing how much of a difference I could see between 2 pointers and 2.5 pointers, and even moreso between 2 pointers and 3 pointers
That is SO funny!! None of those bands can take away from your spectacular e-ring!!
I like option 3 best, followed by option 1. Too small and thin would be too much contrast for me - I prefer balance for this scenario, and I think 3 gives you the best balance. I will also add that contrary to popular opinion, I am afraid of pave set stones. I work and "do stuff" with my hands constantly and pave is known for its delicacy - not a good combination. There's a girl in my office who got her e-ring a month after I got mine, a huge pear set in a pave encrusted band. She's been back to the jeweler 5 times since May for lost stones, and mine, well, mine is sturdy and indelicate....in perfect condition. As planned.
Asscherhalo_lover|1410484208|3749424 said:Honestly, I would have a plain fairly thin pipe cut ring that goes with the metal edges of the thick channel as my complimentary wedding band. Then I would get a sizable diamond eternity to wear on it's own. This way you'll have a wedding "set" with no clashing, keeping the focus on your ER, and a stand alone diamond band. You can also wear the plain plat band if you want a no bling look. More options that way.
Calliecake|1410911784|3752204 said:Endless Summer, They look perfect together! Isn't it a relief when you know you are making the right decision? It never ceases to amaze me how stressful it is making a jewelry purchase. There are just way too many choice!
junebug17|1410912342|3752208 said:Looks beautiful! Excellent choice!
SandyinAnaheim|1410916784|3752238 said:I love it! They do look perfect together! They look perfectly balanced. Hope you enjoy it and post pictures when yours is done.