Which of these 3 Brilliants??

[kkaramacoska]

Ive got a short list!!

http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/G-VS1-Ideal-Cut-Round-Diamond-1197178.asp


http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/G-VS2-Ideal-Cut-Round-Diamond-1255582.asp


http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/G-VS1-Ideal-Cut-Round-Diamond-1253691.asp

All of these stones come up with similar ratings but if anyone out there can see a standout please let me know.
This is going into the Scott Kay the Bow with Pave setting in white gold.

 

[stone-cold11]

yap, all looks good, prefer #2 from the hearts and price.

 

[yssie]

I like #2 best too. Cleanest hearts - though photography angle plays a part in this.

 

[Lorelei]

They all look good but 2 does have the most crisp hearts image.

 

[kkaramacoska]

Ok Thanks guys!!!
I thought No# 1 would be the pick as the IS image is the best................... which I thought ment it would be the most sparkly, But obviously hearts are important too????
Keeping in mind i just want maximum sparkle and prob not so worried about the hearts, still # 2???

 

[stone-cold11]

All the IS looks good, #1 looks tilted when the image is taken making it seem more red on one side that''s all

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 1/24/2010 6:39:27 AM
Author: kkaramacoska
Ok Thanks guys!!!
I thought No# 1 would be the pick as the IS image is the best................... which I thought ment it would be the most sparkly, But obviously hearts are important too????
Keeping in mind i just want maximum sparkle and prob not so worried about the hearts, still # 2???

The saying goes for h&a diamonds " its all in the hearts." This means the hearts are essential in order to judge the overall cutting precision of the stone and to me - no hearts image = no hearts and arrows.

All the diamonds are very well cut and should be beautiful so if you prefer #1 then no reason why you shouldn't go for it.