- Joined
- Apr 23, 2018
- Messages
- 5,791
First off, it's exactly a .2mm size difference. That's a pretty large difference in a smaller stone, and side by side, would most likely be visible in a solitaire setting. Second, BN also has a LIFETIME upgrade program if the upgrade diamond is 2X the cost. After about .7 carat prices start going up pretty significantly from there, so if you wanted to go up from say a .7 carat to a .9-1 carat in the future, it would be at least 2X the cost anyway. So I really don't think that WF is a no-brainer in this case, especially since the BN stone also has all of the "advanced" ASET, H&A, IdealScope images found on enchanted diamonds which look very nice.
Finally, I'm not sure why J stones are still being recommended. It's really not wise to be going this low in color without knowing the recipients preferences. And sure, the stone could be upgraded next year or something, but IMO it's best to get something that the recipient will be happy with from the get-go. It's not really fun for the recipient to look at their ring and go "Oh, it's... yellow" the day after the proposal. With a GIA H color, I think it would at least be a safe enough color in this size stone that, if the recipient noticed it at all, it would just be a minor tint. Depending on how color sensitive the individual is, J's can look quite tinted.
If @Manje did want to go with WF for some reason (even though he already said he prefers BN) then something like this would be a safer choice:
https://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-4094444.htm
My comparison of the WF stones wasn't even against the H VS2 you quoted from Yadav. Yes, against the Yadav stone there is approximately about 0.20mm difference which is about 1/128th inch. Side by side, yes, you would see a slight difference. Doing a blind test, where not side by side, not so much.
But more to the point, the dimensions of the OP's original choice "C" was the comparison.
C https://www.bluenile.com/jp/en/diamond-details/LD12031103
That stone measures exactly 5.55 x 5.57, which is basically a wash with the WF stones I recommended. Also, the WF stones are basically the same price. Except you get a true H&A stone and better upgrade program -- for FREE.
Speaking of upgrade programs, your scenario works because you assume a one time jump. Hell, for that fact, losing half the value ($900) of the original stone is sustainable if they want to go outside BN on the first upgrade, but after words get much more expensive. Depending how the OP would do upgrades over their lifetime, the difference in the upgrade programs can have a significant impact. On the flip side, if the OP never upgrades then both upgrade programs are a waste.
Lastly, I would agree that a firm decision needs made on color and that J can be too tinted for some buyers. Honestly I'm not a J buyer, but there are plenty here who love it. Also, the OP indicated budget was at play in his decision on color along with his (loose) interpretation of color sensitivity. While you have presented an H option, you also presented a hefty $700 (or 39%) price upgrade.
What I am certain about is the OP has been asking about J colored stones. So I don't feel the recommendation of another J was out of line and a disservice to the OP. Especially on a stone this particular size.
Some additional information for the OP to read concerning color:
https://www.whiteflash.com/about-diamonds/diamond-education/the-4-cs-color.htm
https://www.whiteflash.com/about-diamonds/diamond-education/i-color-diamonds-1392.htm