Which is a good value for the money

[secluded]

One is an ideal cut and the other is a cut above from whiteflash:

IDeal cut:
Price $1023, Certificate GIA, .47Carat. color D, Clarity SI1
Measurements 5.09-5.12X3.05 mm, Depth Percentage 59.70 %, Table Percentage 55 %
Girdle TN-, Culet N, Polish Excellent, Symmetry Very Good, Fluorescence: None


A cut above
Price: $1,310.00; Certificate AGS;Carat: 0.486; Color: D;
Clarity: SI1, Depth: 61.3; Table: 56; Crown Angle: 35
Crown %: 15.5; Pavilion Angle: 40.8; Pavilion %: 43.1
Girdle: Thin-Sly Thick-Faceted
Polish: Ideal
Symmetry: Ideal
Culet: Pointed
Fluorescence: Negligible
Measurements: 5.07-5.10X3.12

Lastly would you be able to see much of a different in size from .47 to .52 carat. Please give me some advise. Thanks.

 

[Garry H (Cut Nut)]

GIA do not grade diamonds as Ideal-Cut.
ACA with those proportions is sure to be ideal-cut.
I do not give values on diamonds without seeing them - but you can compare the prices of under and over .5000ct yourself.

I think it is a no brainer though.

Do you have an idealcope image on either or both?

 

[secluded]

"I think it is a no brainer though."

Which one are you referring to is a better buy. Sorry, I am just a newbie - dont know much when comes to specs.... Thanks.

I dont have ideal scope on neither. That is what they advertised on the net.

 

[Garry H (Cut Nut)]

"they" have no right to claim "ideal" status.

Do some price searches under the "by HCA cut quality" in the top left of the page and compare prices of known well cut (ideal according to me).
As I said - I do cut, not value.