- Joined
- Apr 28, 2008
- Messages
- 11,676
Feb03Bride|1339778910|3216990 said:Laila619|1339777179|3216969 said:Feb03Bride|1339776925|3216966 said:Both but for difference reasons (IMO). Halos give that round finger coverage, the bigger center stone look. Three stones have the finger coverage spread, from finger side to finger side. Having had both, people definitely noticed the halo more than the three stone, however halos are so common now, that I think back when I had one, it was new and different.
Do you still have your 1.80 haloed? Would you want two halo rings?
Feb! Good to see you. Nope, I sold that diamond for a nice little profit that went into the bling fund! I was able to use the crazy diamond price increases to my advantage.
Oh, wow! That's awesome! So just so I'm up to speed, you only have your .98 now?
Yes, exactly. Well, plus the two new side stones I purchased this spring. DH thinks I should just stick with the three stone because otherwise, the side stones would go to waste. I never wear studs so can't make them into earrings. I'll tell you, I don't regret selling the 1.8 carat at all. It freed up a lot of money, and I hardly ever wore it anyway. What's going on in your neck of the bling woods? Do you still have your round from Jared?