Which diamond is better? Need help with ASET interpretation.

[profman2]

I have 2 diamonds with excellent specifications, and I have light performanceimages of them that I will post here. The first is 1.02 ct (47836401D) and the 2nd is 1.25 ct (45969141D). Based on the two images, what can I expect for brilliance and fire? Which will be the better choice?

 

[tyty333]

Well, neither is bad, but neither is great either. Can you post the numbers associated with the stones (or provide a link to the stones)?

 

[YoLaL]

Honestly both stones are bad light performance..Not really worth it to buy if yoi want a better performance rock

 

[blueMA]

They look about neck to neck in comparison.
The first one may look a bit brighter in person and it's probably a bit shallower stone. The second one seems to have a bit better symmetry, but varying lower girdle may cause it to look darker in spots under the table. If I absolutely had to choose, I may go with the 1st one, but it's tough to tell without seeing all the data.

 

[Lorelei]

Well, neither is bad, but neither is great either. Can you post the numbers associated with the stones (or provide a link to the stones)?

Hi Profman,

Same as Ty, if you could link to the reports or post all the proportions here please, that would help. We cannot estimate performance nuances just from one static image.

 

[WinkHPD]

Just a small point of clarification for future readers: the topic asks for input on ASET interpretation, but these are Ideal-Scope images. As usual, the prosumers here are giving you good advice.

Wink