- Joined
- Jan 30, 2008
- Messages
- 5,083
Well, I DID mention this (this being the domestic deployment of the army) in a thread I opened a while back, and got very little real comment before the thing evolved into a discussion of the right to bear arms and our form of government (for the benefit of the Aussies here). The one comment that I do recall clearly, was the one about tin foil and investing in Alcoa, indicating that maaaaybe I was being just a teensy paranoid. I''m not, but if people want to be in denial of the REAL erosion of our protections, then I can''t do much about that. I just put it out there. I drone it like a mantra: Power once granted is rarely relinquished. I''m certain McCain wouldn''t have. I had, and still have, hopes that Obama MIGHT. Might restore the safegaurds that Bush has destroyed. This is the chance I took on him. Hopefully he won''t abuse the signing statements like Bush did, but we shall see.
If Obama is truly proposing this, he will need to be stopped. Period. If he seriously trots this out, I will be as vociferously against him for it as I was and am against Bush for not just proposing it but actually DOING it. The precedent has already been set people, make no mistake. It will probably never be used, but the barn door is now standing wide open, and that DOES scare the willies out of me.
That said, I think at this point the Obama thing is a tempest in a teacup - it is a far cry from a soundbyte during a campaign to actual execution, and of far less concern than what Bush has already set in motion, and made possible.