I picked Good balance of all three but the answer I really wanted was the most I can get of all 3.
ie: 3vh+ b-scope 9.8isee2
Which while can be called "Good balance of all three" is not the same thing.
Then there is the asscher which looking 10 miles deep like you can lose yourself in it is the important part with flash and fire being second.
There is nothing I hate more in my fav shape (princess) than a drak center... if it has one, I don't care how brilliant it is...how much fire it has....
Good balance...because I have seen a stone that is mostly brilliance and no fire/scint...and have seen the great balance of all three, the stone I have now. It's hands down better than the previous stone, so to me it's the 3 that all work together to create the beautiful stone, not one standing out over the others.
Shape, fire, brilliance, scintillation – I, too, believe that these are the four attributes of a diamond’s beauty. Not one should be left behind but it usually is.
Scintillation, brilliance, a clean table and of coarse a bargain is always a bonus (that is probably in the "other" category). The perfect symmetry of some rough is beautiful in and of itself as well.
Well... I'd say the shape does it alone, even if the other three attributes are not there. No one wears diamonds on a string: while using standard cut stones is not really a limitation on jewelry design, the pieces that match the cut of the stones to the shape and patterns of the jewelry piece appeal to me that much more. Not sure this makes allot of sense, but it does to me.