What do you think of these angles?

[Nick payne]

A healer wants to show me a stone with a 40.6 crown, 36 pavilion, and a 58 table and a 61.8 depth. I know having the stealer crown will lead to more fire and less distinctive arrows, unsure what effect having a shallower stone due to the larger table will have. Any thoughts?

It is an 2.2ct I SI2 that is supposedly eye clean for $15k.

 

[JulieN]

The angles are fine, no worries.

Your typos crack me up.

 

[ringo865]

I'm sure your healer won't have images for you to post, but you could post the GIA report number or a pic of the GIA report and angle diagram/inclusion plot. People can weigh in.

For clarity, SI2 could go either way as far as being eye clean. Images would certainly help.

 

[Nick payne]

Here is the GIA. After seeing in person, it is definitely a very nice stone. Under the store lighting I would see one of the wisps, but in a setting, I could not find it. Also could not find in outdoor lighting or in yellow, more home/restaurant type lighting. There is an inclusion in the middle visible under the loop that is a little concerning but I could not find with the naked eye. Here are some bad pics and video.

 

[SimoneDi]

That would not be an eye-clean stone for me and I have an SI2 myself. You can do better online.

 

[BarbBe]

This would be a good choice:


https://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond...t_round-EX-GIA--SI1-diamond-stock-14114-cert-

 

[Nick payne]

BarbBe

I actually have that stone in my possession haha. I am down to two stones--going to make a new post to get clarification on some other questions.

 

[BarbBe]

Thatś great Nick - keep me posted. I have purchased and upgraded two diamonds with GOG. Only the best experiences.

 

[diamondseeker2006]

That would not be an eye-clean stone for me and I have an SI2 myself. You can do better online.

Yep, thousands of choices. I wouldn't settle for that one, either.