what are your thoughts on these 2 idealscopes

[spicoli12]

please let me know you think

 

[gm89uk]

Both are lovely. I prefer a smaller table so I'd pick number 2, but you can't go wrong with either. Numbers?

 

[ac117]

I agree with gm in preferring #2...it also has slightly fatter arrows, which I really like!

 

[flyingpig]

Both are equally nice. If I need to choose, it is #1 for me.

 

[gm89uk]

The only thing that concerns me in #1 is the dark inclusion near the centre around 03:00

 

[spicoli12]

The only thing that concerns me in #1 is the dark inclusion near the centre around 03:00

its this diamond . do you think the inclusion will be noticable?

https://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut/2.85-carat-j-color-si1-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-2575641

 

[Tophat1]

There is no way I would buy that diamond

 

[spicoli12]

There is no way I would buy that diamond

because of the inclusion?

 

[Tophat1]

Yes - right on the table surface and it looks like it would not be eye clean other than at very far distances

 

[flyingpig]

There is no way I would buy that diamond

nvm..

I absolutely adore the appearance and light performance, but the inclusion is a deal breaker. Plus, it is a bit deep. How about the link to #2 stone??