- Joined
- Jan 24, 2003
- Messages
- 1,948
The accusation of cronyism is vague because how does that tie to his accusations? No doubt there are competing lines of thought at NIH and BARDA on how to handle this virus, and all of them are likely experts. He is no more special or expert because he spoke to the press. This line of thinking that everyone working in the government who runs to the press is altruistic or the best expert because they speak out against Trump is puzzling to me. Is it confirmation bias?
Edit - I don't see WHISTLEBLOWER anywhere in that article so that is extreme hyperbole.
He is special because he was fired from his position for reasons that the people responsible for his reassignment are choosing to remain silent about.
I am not OK with lawyers having to figure out if experts in their field were "wrongly" reassigned. In my opinion, we should ENCOURAGE experts that have a different expert opinion to challenge the non-experts when necessary. I don't want the country I love to be run like a dictatorship where an expert is reassigned while its president that has no expertise, and therefore no business offering medical advice, gets on the news every night advocating for unproven and possibly dangerous remedies.
I don't know why you're hung-up on whether or not Dr. Bright has the right to consider himself a whistleblower. The designation doesn't make much difference these days; Trump attacks whistleblowers.