diamonewbie
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2004
- Messages
- 28
Howdy,
Well my jeweler who set the diamond for me is making her band as well. She was going to use my fiance''s grandmother''s ring, which was a gaudy cluster of small rubies and diamonds. She has made a mold already (so I''m already going to have to pay for that), which is supposed to have stones all the way around the band (ruby, diamond, ruby, diamond, etc.). The stones are around .2 carats, possibly less...I will find out this weekend or early next week.
Anyway, the dilemma is that she just called me and told me that we will need at least 10 more stones to go all the way around the band. Also, she said the diamonds were chipped and cut in the "old style", and that it might look weird next to newer cut diamonds.
So, now I''m probably looking at spending a LOT more than I was anticipating on this ring. I thought I had the stones covered, and now it''s looking like I may have to purchase a few more rubies and a bunch of diamonds.
My question is...do you think it would look strange having this dichotomy of diamond cut in a band? Perhaps like this...ruby, old diamond, ruby, new diamond, etc.? Thanks,
Jon
PS-for those who remember my diamond purchase from several weeks ago, here''s my story: she knew all about the rock and had seen it, but not set in the ring. She thought I was going to pick it up the next day, but I picked it up that night and brought it to her, lying on top of a container of Ben & Jerry''s Chubby Hubby.