Vintage ring...any idea what kind of cut this is? Fishtail prong
- Thread starter Kacilyng
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2010
- Messages
- 5,614
Hi
Thank you so much for the reply, I will be taking it to a jeweler when I have time it’s tough because I have to go during the week when the jeweler is there and I work a lot.
Is there anyway that I can tell?
I really appreciate your time
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2004
- Messages
- 26,952
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2013
- Messages
- 2,389
Hi Kacyling!
Your center stone looks like an Early Modern Brilliant stone. It is not Old European Cut or Transitional. The ring setting is likely from the the 1930s or 1940s. I’ll attach photos of my own ring which is from the 1930s/1940s below. My diamond and your diamond are similar. Early Modern Brilliant diamond cut style is characterized by a large table, small crown angle, shallower depth. This economized on the carat weight and spread the weight out horizontally, to the edges, making for wider diameter stones in relation to carat weight. Your side stones also look like Early Modern Round Brilliants, not single cuts. The head of your ring is a type of illusion setting that visually widens the appearance of the diameter as well. I can’t tell if the stone really is original to the ring because there is a tiny almost imperceptible airline between the stone and the setting that could mean the original diamond was switched out. But the current style looks EMRB to me.
See photos below of my Early Modern Round Brilliant
Ring styles from the 1940s
Your center stone looks like an Early Modern Brilliant stone. It is not Old European Cut or Transitional. The ring setting is likely from the the 1930s or 1940s. I’ll attach photos of my own ring which is from the 1930s/1940s below. My diamond and your diamond are similar. Early Modern Brilliant diamond cut style is characterized by a large table, small crown angle, shallower depth. This economized on the carat weight and spread the weight out horizontally, to the edges, making for wider diameter stones in relation to carat weight. Your side stones also look like Early Modern Round Brilliants, not single cuts. The head of your ring is a type of illusion setting that visually widens the appearance of the diameter as well. I can’t tell if the stone really is original to the ring because there is a tiny almost imperceptible airline between the stone and the setting that could mean the original diamond was switched out. But the current style looks EMRB to me.
See photos below of my Early Modern Round Brilliant
Ring styles from the 1940s
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2008
- Messages
- 28,145
Wow! Thanks for all the great info!! I am amazed at the knowledge you guys have!! And lightbright your ring is gorgeous!
Past, Present, Future: The Meaning of Three-Stone Engagement Rings
Past, Present, Future: The Meaning of Three-Stone Engagement Rings - 04/14
300x240.png)