- Joined
- Oct 23, 2011
- Messages
- 7,355
The filigree looks to have some wear and a bit of thinning. That would lean to not a repro for me, but it's hard with just the face on photos.
It also looks like the synthetic emerald or emerald glass on the bottom has a chip? I can see a little bit of abrasion in the corners of the top one as well, I think by your photo.
With signs of age I would think it is a better likelihood that it is authentic, and this particular style is less faked than a target ring.
I can't tell the cut on the center diamond. Is it an old cut?
I guess the question is for the money, if it turns out not to be authentic to the time. Will you be upset?
It’s an oec about .10. Super white and clean. There is evidence that it was reshanked.
I too think it could be old with maybe rhodium plating and that’s why it’s so white
I’m with you, I’m not a fan of the rhodiumI was wondering the same. I know a lot of places do that. I don't care for that practice. It is kind of blindingly white!
I was wondering the same. I know a lot of places do that. I don't care for that practice. It is kind of blindingly white!