Steel
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2006
- Messages
- 4,884
Date: 12/9/2007 9:21:21 AM
Author: QD Rocks
Hi stebbo,
The diamond we are talking about doesnt seem to have a scan cert on either site. And a feature that could show a scan of every report would be a great improvement but is impossible the way the trade works. We make every effort like the rest of the online sellers to do this but its not possible. I also fully understand a shipper will buy from where ever he feels happiest with. I am not here to compare my company with the finest in the business but my reason for these posts are, you do not save money buying overseas. If you want to because you like the site or the staff or for any other reason then thats your choice.
Lord Sommerisle
You do have a good knolwedge and i am sure when searching for yourself or friends you will find a great stone at the best prices. You have good reason to be a WF fan they do a great job. But we are just trying to give the UK consumer a diffrent option than buying overseas. Every company has strenghs and weaknesses
but so many people on this forum shout that you save so much money buying overeas and this is not the case.
Its been a pleasure speaking with you.
Paul
Later post:
Stebbo & summerisle
You havent been to hard on me, all i wanted to do was get the price point across. I understand Ps is a community and you advise people on what you feel is best. I do intend to approach Ps about marketing as it seems such a great place for consumers to get honest info they would never get in a store and i think its great.
Earlier post:
Its a shame all the UK members seemed determined to buy overseas. Once you pay the duties and taxes it doesnt save you anything plus its very hard to deal with alterations if any are needed. Plus buying british and staying legal must be good. It will save you money compared to High street prices but not from UK Online prices.
Kind Regards
Paul
Belated Welcome to PS QD Rocks,
i) I believe that you may merely be stating your opinion as fact, with reference to the highlighted parts of your posts.
While you are entitled to your opinion; I reserve my judgment that it is not possible for such a blanket statement to be true. If it is I wonder the extent of your research? Most PS''ers are aware that diamond vendors have access to a shared inventory. Most PS vendor’s price match each other on this virtual inventory so that is nothing new here. Some vendors (e.g. WF is the name I know and trust but GOG also applies; off the top of my head) examine and take certain diamonds into their stock (eg. ACA,ES). Such ''in stock'' branded diamonds has engendered confidence in me and other PS''s. Just to ask that we compare apples to apples and the like. Price matching virtual stock is great but (IMO) whatever, PS''ers tend to go for the branded goodies.
ii) With reference to your company, I understood that you had to mention your firm (I stand to be corrected). Perhaps you should check that out? I didn’t read the rules to mean that this was discretionary. Rather than underlining your impartiality, I feel that not referencing your interests has the opposite effect. Perhaps that is just me? Mentioning your interests is not just down to marketing, it also recognises your partiality.
That said, I restate my welcome, which I mean most heartily. Knowledge can never be considered a bad thing. But I would prefer all cards on the table and all affiliations out too.