YUP, like the Oklahoma bombing.. homegrown terrorists kill.
Like Waco. that was horrible.
We grow them here too.
I didn't have to turn on the tv after the Boston Marathon. I had friends and relatives that were there.
Do I think it was Obama's fault, no. How about this type of hate crime, where
"Srinivas Kuchibhotla died when suspect, named by police as 52-year-old Adam Purinton, walked into "Bar and Grill in the Kansas City suburb of Olathe and opened fire on Wednesday evening. Kuchibhotla's friend, Alok Madasani, and Ian Grillot, a bar-goer who tried to intervene in the attack, were also shot, but survived."
I worry about every nut job in this country being able to easily own a gun.
Edited to say: I am glad you personally feel safer. It really sucks to not feel safe. I just get really riled about about mentally unstable people committing crimes and then being used as scapegoats. There will always be people running around in this world that are dangerous, it's human nature. No one can ever make us totally safe. Reality. Peace and love.
You are going way back. There are plenty of more current ones, in fact just one last Sunday. And of course what about Paris, and St. Petersburg, Russia.
Again my heart goes out to them and my gratefulness to the President that knock wood, nothing has happened here. on his watch.
Well we just had a shooting at a school in San Bernadino.. another homegrown murderer... I hope we dont have anything on Cheeto's time either, under Trump we had 9/11 and Boston bombing where 3 killed many wounded.. Just because something happened in 1995 doesn't mean that it doesn't count.. we all remember 9/11. Most terrorists so far in the USA are homegrown muslims that are radicalized or they are nutcases.
Info re: mental illness stereotypes and mass shootings
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4318286/
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2015/10/mental-health-gun-laws-washington-post-poll
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/16/opinion/dont-blame-mental-illness-for-gun-violence.html
http://psychiatryonline.org.psychiatryonline.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/appi.books.9781615371099
Well we just had a shooting at a school in San Bernadino.. another homegrown murderer... I hope we dont have anything on Cheeto's time either, under Trump we had 9/11 and Boston bombing where 3 killed many wounded.. Just because something happened in 1995 doesn't mean that it doesn't count.. we all remember 9/11. Most terrorists so far in the USA are homegrown muslims that are radicalized or they are nutcases.
This subject is surprisingly spread out to research for several reasons, and honestly, I got too tired to go too deep into it, so I think you're going to have to show me where you're getting that, because that's not ringing true to me.
Other than the fact that the definition of "terrorism" usually morphs to fit whatever drum the writer is beating, making things very muddy, my suspicion is you're going to find that "most terrorists so far in the USA" are homegrown, NOT Muslim, and no more nutcase than in the usual population, nutcase simply being one of those convenient terms that allows dodging real analysis of the terrorist and the act IN CONTEXT of the culture.
And I'll post a link again to the latest (and totally under-reported) case of a foiled home-grown non-Muslim terrorism attempt:
3 militia group members arrested in alleged bomb plot targeting Somalis in Kansas
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...mb-plot-targeting-somalis-20161014-story.html
And just a little tidbit that shows just how not no-longer-relevant 1995 is, these guys apparently had McVeigh's exploit in mind while planning their attempt. Everything old is new again, right?
"The complaint said that Stein discussed the explosives used in the 1995 bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City by Timothy McVeigh."
Just kick every human race out of the U.S. expect us Chinese b/c we are all peaceful human beings...http://www.dailywire.com/news/11410/complete-list-radical-islamic-terror-attacks-us-james-barrett
My point was that most muslim terrorist (shooters, mass killers) have been either American citizens or naturalized citizens and become radicalized by the internet or a mullah or prison etc.
Ruby, Obama went to Congress and they said NO.. what more can be done.. he was damned if he did and damned if he didn't. Many republicans did NOT support him.. please read my pointers. there's another good article today in the times about how republicans would not back him. The American people did not want us the US involved in a middle east war.. he did what was counseled to him.. So what .. now we have quick draw mccheeto.. so now the russians have moved closer to our ships.. man up baby.. this is going to be a real scary time. republicans like republican wars - sadly.
I'm totally not one for claiming false flags and all that shit, but this just seems too convenient.
Kate, do you think Obama was wrong when he tried to gain support for the air strikes? Or do you think he never really intended to intervene?
People were gassed with Sarin.. Probably one of Assad's worst.
The President had to act, and act fast. He did not need Congress's approval.
And of course the flip of it could be there was no Trump / Putin bromance to begin with.
The talking heads on MSNBC were spewing the same nonsense that this was all a ruse.
Just kick every human race out of the U.S. expect us Chinese b/c we are all peaceful human beings...
no no not the Irish Americans.. we make great cops and drink a lotta beer! we only beat each other up.
I don't disagree either. I don't know why anyone would take that job, and to me, he made his bed on day one with the whole inauguration size debacle. The gaslighting started immediately. As expected. No credibility after that moment, and it gets crazier each day with each daily WH press briefing. It really is must see tv. I agree that he gets himself into so many pickles because you simply can't defend the indefensible, you can't explain the unexplainable, the spin that this president and his administration require in general is mind bending. On top of it, I don't think he really has the temperament needed for the job, which is, under any circumstances, stressful and difficult.Just read this interesting take on Spicer as Trump's spokesman, and I can't say I disagree. Thoughts?
https://newrepublic.com/article/141990/sean-spicer-perfectly-awful-spokesman-donald-trump-deserves
there was a PUTIN hates Hillary thinks he can work with Trump bromance.. Trump I think had no clue about what he was getting into with the Russians and thought.. "Hey I"m a good guy, I make DEALS! and we can deal" I think Trump didn't have enough intel to really say that but he's a huge bigmouth. I remember when Obama was first elected and was called out about not ending the conflicts n the middle east. he said he was privy to more intel as president and sometimes what you say when running has to be rethought. I think this has happened to Trumpty Dumpty too, it took him a while to get there but he's shut up and is working on a real policy - I think.