tough choice... which princess

[nswartzb]

Based on the stats, which would you expect tp be the "best" stone?
That is, which would you choose?
(Feel free to rank 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc.)

2.01 E/VS1
L/W 1.02
Depth 73.3%
Table 68%
Girdle STK-TK
Culet N
Pol/Sym EX/G
Fluor N
Crown/(Crown angle)13.8%/(43.1)
Pavilion/(Pavilion angle) 55.2%/(58.9)

2.01 F/IF
L/W 1.01
Depth 75%
Table 69%
Girdle M
Culet N
Pol/Sym VG/VG
Fluor N
Crown/(Crown angle) 12%/(40.4)
Pavilion/(Pavilion angle) 60%/(59.0)

2.18 F/VVS2
L/W 1.00
Depth 73%
Table 69%
Girdle M
Culet N
Pol/Sym EX/VG
Fluor N
Crown/(Crown angle) 13%/(47)
Pavilion/(Pavilion angle) 58%/(39.6)

2.03 F/VVS2
L/W 1.05
Depth 71.6%
Table 67%
Girdle TN-TK
Culet N
Pol/Sym VG/G
Fluor N
Crown/(Crown angle) 10%/(35.
Pavilion/(Pavilion angle) 58.2%/(59.3)

2.02 D/VVS2
L/W 1.03
Depth 71.3%
Table 70%
Girdle M-STK
Culet N
Pol/Sym G/G
Fluor N
Crown/(Crown angle) 8.2%/(unknown)
Pavilion/(Pavilion angle) 63.1%/(unknown)

 

[moremoremore]

Holy carp you've got some nice ones!!! This is going to be HARD. I have a feeling that the only way to make the final cut is to get light/ideal scope images or bscope.. I would however, forget about the last one...and the second is a bit deep and I wouldn't pay the IF clarity premium. NICE CHOICES THO!!!

 

[nswartzb]

trying to get down to 2 or 3, then will rely on reputable PS vendor to send idealscopes and make side-by-side comparisions/recommendations.

 

[alexah]

I agree w MMM - i'd lose #s 2 & 5.

I like everything about the 2.18 but the crown/pav angles are v dif from the rest... hmm...

V nice selection nswartzb

 

[nswartzb]

So, is the consensus (of 2 people so far) #1, #4, #3, #2, #5? Others care to chime in?