- Joined
- Jan 11, 2006
- Messages
- 58,581
I got pictures and video from WF comparing 2.6 I and 2.88 J.
I think the color difference is not worth the size sacrifice, so I’ll go with the J. And for CBI, because it has 0.10mm differences I also don’t think it worth the sacrifice. As for the color, I’m completely aware that J would be outside my comfortable range but I know thats the best I can get with my budget at this time because I prioritize the size. I’ll just make a peace with it. So I’ll quietly waiting my ring to be shipped to me next week. Thank you all for helping me making decision!!!!!
here is the youtube link:
![]()
No, although I have searched online, I have yet to find actual details and/or legal filings relating to the Paul Slegers / CBI / HPD legal dispute. I wish PS would provide links to reputable third-party sites to give PSers/consumers more information on this situation.
I am hesitant to rely 100% on HPD's statements concerning the matter since (1) HPD is a named party to the dispute and (2) HPD's success depends on continuing sales/upgrades.
I have bought diamonds from WF, BGD, and CBI ... I will say the CBI diamond is outstanding yet my preferred vendor is BGD as personally, overall, I have had better customer service experiences with BGD. That said, if I had a better sense of what is happening with the Slegers/CBI/HPD situation, I would be proceeding with a CBI upgrade.
I do encourage you to go with your gut with respect to vendor, and then find the diamond.
YMMV.
^ that is what Wink says.
This is what PS said:
https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/update-regarding-high-performance-diamonds-inc.262116/
The vendor (HPD) has a vested interest in presenting the situation as a lowkey dispute; PS however removed HPD as a featured sponsor "due to legal disputes surrounding High Performance Diamonds."
OP, you are going down a really slippery slope. No one can tell you, yes $9.5k extra is worth it to go over the 3ct threshold and a color up. People pick what they pick based on their own personal wants and means. For what’s worth, I still think you made the right choice with the 2.8 J SI1.
Diamond A looks cleaner to me. Is it higher in color and clarity? I think that was your original WF stone as far as I can tell. B might be the same color but a little larger??? I have no idea which costs more unless one is over 3 cts and the other is under 3 cts. They both look like SI1 clarity, and close to J color.
You said on the other page your absolute max was about $25,750. So unless that has changed, I think you do need to stick with the 2.88 J SI1. Maybe you can upgrade size or other specs later?
If you are looking at higher priced stones, I wonder if this one is better than the one on the right? It looks a little cleaner to me and maybe whiter.
Diamond | 3.058 ct I SI1 A CUT ABOVE® Hearts and Arrows Super Ideal Round Cut Loose Diamond AGS Certified | 4219825
This Whiteflash A CUT ABOVE® super ideal cut hearts and arrows 3.058 carat I color SI1 clarity loose diamond is graded by the American Gem Society (AGS) Laboratories. | 4219825www.whiteflash.com
Obviously I can't tell you what table size to like, but I actually think the one with the 57.2 table as a nice bright center which would be very appealing to me. I also agree that it looks like a whiter I color, although I think they need to be pulled and compared to be sure.
It does seem like you are having difficulty coming to a decision even though your budget isn't the problem it was before. There are multiple options at WF. I personally wouldn't buy from HPD until there is a complete explanation about what is going on, and I'd like to know who will own it after Wink retires due to there being zero guarantee that a new owner will honor the trade-in policies that were in place under a previous owner. Do you have stones on hold there? You must because I see none that are even close to what you are looking for.
Will Wink retire? And are the Whiteflash owners still very young? (: I find the upgrade policies and their intricacies very interesting.