Torn between 2 stones

[donblaximus]

Price on these stones is virtually the same.

Please give opinions on which one looks better on paper. I saw both in person but I could not see them side by side. They both seemed great, GIA seemed a bit whiter while the AGS seemed a bit better cut (more defined hearts and arrows)

What are your thoughts?

Thanks

Stone 1

Round Brilliant
Measurements: 8.42 - 8.45 x 5.20 mm
Carat Weight: 2.28 carat
Color Grade: I
Clarity Grade: VS2
Cut Grade: Excellent
Proportions:
Depth: 61.7%
Table: 58%
Crown Angle: 36.0°
Crown Height: 15.5%
Pavilion Angle: 40.6°
Pavilion Depth: 42.5%
Star length: 50%
Lower Half: 75%
Girdle: Medium, Faceted
Culet: None
Finish:
Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Excellent
Fluorescence: None
Comments: Additional clouds are not shown.

Stone 2

AGS#: 104047030002
Report Type: The Platinum Light Performance Diamond Quality® Document
Shape and Style: Round Brilliant
Measurements: 8.38 - 8.41 x 5.18 mm
Cut Grade: AGS Ideal 0
Color Grade: AGS 2.5 (I)
Clarity Grade: AGS 4 (VS2)
Carat Weight 2.253
Fluorescence: Negligible
Comments:



Additional clouds are not shown.



Light Performance: 0
Polish: Ideal
Symmetry: Ideal
Table: 56.8%
Crown Angle: 35.0
Crown Height: 14.9%
Girdle: Faceted, 1.8% to 3.9%
Pavilion Angle: 40.9
Pavilion Depth: 43.1%
Star Length: 50%
Lower Girdle Length: 79%
Total Depth: 61.7%
Culet: Pointed

 

[stone-cold11]

Both could work from the numbers but the GIA stone is slightly further away from tolkowsky ideal cut proportion than the AGS stone. Tends towards more fire performance at the expense of brilliance and slightly smaller diameter.

Personal preference on which you prefer.