- Joined
- Aug 7, 2013
- Messages
- 1,863
More thoughts on an anniversary ring for the fall. I’ve been thinking about a three-stone or five-stone, but another contender is a two-stone (both diamond) ring. This would maximize diamond size for the budget. For a simple and inexpensive setting, what do you all think if this? I want the setting to be simple, thin, and on the lesser expensive side so that all of the budget goes to the diamonds. 
(Budget is still unknown at this time but will be around $4500, I think).
This one above seems to be pictured with a matching wedding band that I would not buy.
I like this profile shown below—Victorian style prongs. Would .50 diamonds (1.0 ctw) get lost in six prongs? These pics look okay, and I believe they are about .50 diamonds. Stuller also has 4-prong styles, but this one spoke to me.
https://www.stuller.com/products/122929/?groupId=192897&recommendationSource=SiteSearch
(Budget is still unknown at this time but will be around $4500, I think).

This one above seems to be pictured with a matching wedding band that I would not buy.

I like this profile shown below—Victorian style prongs. Would .50 diamonds (1.0 ctw) get lost in six prongs? These pics look okay, and I believe they are about .50 diamonds. Stuller also has 4-prong styles, but this one spoke to me.

