Hi everyone,
I'm trying to figure out if the Tiffany Soleste Emerald is the "best" ring for me. It's an emerald with a halo that has clipped/rounded corners and a pave, but this can be found elsewhere. However, it seems like the Tiffany ring has the smallest band/pave size? They don't post the width of the ring/pave ct size but based on a ring on I Do, Now I Don't (total ct = 1.28, center stone = 1.03ct, ring size = 4.5, 40 pave diamonds), each pave stone is about 0.00625ct (1.1mm). Other places seem to have larger pave sizes with a minimum width of 1.8mm. Is the Tiffany ring just structurally unsound?
I'd like something like the Tiffany ring with a small band and have the wedding band sit flush against it (the Tiffany ring won't let that happen). For reference, I have a size 4 finger and I'd probably go closer to center stone of 0.5ct.
I'm trying to figure out if the Tiffany Soleste Emerald is the "best" ring for me. It's an emerald with a halo that has clipped/rounded corners and a pave, but this can be found elsewhere. However, it seems like the Tiffany ring has the smallest band/pave size? They don't post the width of the ring/pave ct size but based on a ring on I Do, Now I Don't (total ct = 1.28, center stone = 1.03ct, ring size = 4.5, 40 pave diamonds), each pave stone is about 0.00625ct (1.1mm). Other places seem to have larger pave sizes with a minimum width of 1.8mm. Is the Tiffany ring just structurally unsound?
I'd like something like the Tiffany ring with a small band and have the wedding band sit flush against it (the Tiffany ring won't let that happen). For reference, I have a size 4 finger and I'd probably go closer to center stone of 0.5ct.