Table 58, CA 46, PA 40.6 any issues? (IS provided)

[jcizl1986]

Here is the video and cert. Im still learning re IS image interpretation so a bit non-committal on this one. Also a slight worry on the eye cleanliness of that feather that can easily be seen in all images.

1.01 carat (ct) GIA Round Loose Diamond G Color SI1 Clarity Excellent Cut

www.b2cjewels.com

https://www.b2cjewels.com/OpenPdf?f...iamond/2408/17776933/certificate/17776933.pdf

[/URL]






Also, any thoughts on the two stones in this thread from yesterday would be greatly appreciated. I just have the one IS image below of the stone in the first JA link in the thread

Any clarity red flags here?

https://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut/1.01-carat-g-color-si1-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-7824777?a_aid=ps https://www.jamesallen.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut/1.01-carat-g-color-si1-clarity-excellent-cut-sku-8060878 2nd one is 600 dollars more than the first one. Both...

www.pricescope.com

 

[jcizl1986]

Edit: 36 CA, lol

 

[jcizl1986]

Apologies, link to cert is not working , here it is:

 

[lovedogs]

Is the cert for the JA one, or the b2c one?

 

[jcizl1986]

Is the cert for the JA one, or the b2c one?

B2c

 

[lovedogs]

I personally prefer the b2c option.

 

[jcizl1986]

I personally prefer the b2c option.

Thanks, appreciate it, any particular reason?

 

[Karl_K]

The ASET and IS both pass the test.
Ask them about the inclusion based on them taking the ASET they should have it in stock so someone can eyeball it.

 

[jcizl1986]

The ASET and IS both pass the test.
Ask them about the inclusion based on them taking the ASET they should have it in stock so someone can eyeball it.

Interesting, I thought the JA stone would be more of a PS’rs taste given the 34 CA and 40.8 PA on the 57 table

 

[lovedogs]

Thanks, appreciate it, any particular reason?

Can't quite put my finger on it....looks "sharper" to me somehow? Brighter in the video/images? Not sure exactly what I'm seeing, but if it were me choosing I'd go for the B2C one.