shape
carat
color
clarity

Starting my diamond search, advice please

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

STEVESKI

Rough_Rock
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
5

Hi everyone,


I''ve been browsing this forum for a couple weeks now and I have learned so much, so thank you everybody! I''ve really narrowed down what my priorities are when coming to the 4C''s. Here is what my ideal diamond would be in order of importance to me:


Round Brilliant
Price: ~$5,000
1.25ct - 1.5ct (at least 7mm in width)
Cut: Ideal/Excellent -- I think H&A is out of my price range, but I want as close to a perfect cut as possible
Color: I/J -- I''d prefer a better color grade, but that would put me out of my price range
Clarity: I just want it to be as eye clean as possible so I''m hoping to find an eye clean SI1/SI2

Just to clarify some more, I''m in my mid 20''s and not seeking the most perfect colored, clear cut diamond out there. I want something that looks rather large, sparkles very well in the light, and doesn''t have any big noticeable inclusions or anything noticeably strange about it. I''m also just starting my search so I do not have any need to make a decision within the next couple days or anything, but I don''t want to pass up on a good diamond for the right price if I find one.


My local store sent me these certificates of diamonds that they thought would fit my description. I checked and they both score under a HCA 2.0. The problem is that they are in there virtual inventory and would need them to get shipped to the store to see them in person first. What does everyone think? Are there any clear red flags that say to stay away from these diamonds? I think it''s obvious that there are some inclusions that affect some light performance, but would they be visible to the eye? Thanks everyone!





1.41ct_J_SI2_AGS_RBC.jpg
 
Here''s the 2nd one a 1.39 ct.

1.39ct_J_SI2_AGS_RB.jpg
 
Date: 4/2/2010 9:09:28 AM
Author: STEVESKI
Here''s the 2nd one a 1.39 ct.
Hi Steveski

They both have potential but I prefer the numbers of the second stone from the info we have. It would be best to check the cavity inclusion on the second diamond isn''t a potential durability issue, make any sale final on the stone you select checking out to your satisfaction with an independant appraisal and also find out if either of these are eyeclean to your standards. Is it possible the store could call both in at no cost to you so you can compare them?
 
Thanks for the quick response Lorelei. I''m glad you think they both have potential. It looks like all the research I''ve been doing is paying off. I''ve contacted the jeweler and asked them if there are any more images of the diamonds that they can send. I also asked him to check on the durability issue of the 1.39ct one and asked him if it would cost me anything to see the diamonds in person. Thanks again. I''ll let you know when I hear more.
 
Date: 4/2/2010 9:38:00 AM
Author: STEVESKI
Thanks for the quick response Lorelei. I''m glad you think they both have potential. It looks like all the research I''ve been doing is paying off. I''ve contacted the jeweler and asked them if there are any more images of the diamonds that they can send. I also asked him to check on the durability issue of the 1.39ct one and asked him if it would cost me anything to see the diamonds in person. Thanks again. I''ll let you know when I hear more.
You are welcome and it definitely looks like you have done your homework! Let us know how it goes and if you need any more help, don''t hesitate to ask!
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top