unfortunately I think the only person that has the HI-res, would be the original owners that took the shotDate: 3/24/2010 5:36:54 PM
Author: NewGuy12
Yes, exactly. I have images that were posted on the forums but the problem is that when I zoom in on the particulars...it gets very grainy.
do you have the CAD pictures? the diamonds share common prongs if that''s any help.Date: 3/24/2010 5:53:16 PM
Author: NewGuy12
Mainly the details inside the gallery and the details in between and around each 2 pointer around the circumfrence. I am trying to compare these images to the CAD renderings but the granularity of the web photo''s isn''t good enough.
Yes, they are bead set/common prong and there is milgrain.Date: 3/24/2010 6:05:38 PM
Author: D&T
do you have the CAD pictures? the diamonds share common prongs if that''s any help.Date: 3/24/2010 5:53:16 PM
Author: NewGuy12
Mainly the details inside the gallery and the details in between and around each 2 pointer around the circumfrence. I am trying to compare these images to the CAD renderings but the granularity of the web photo''s isn''t good enough.
yes on the gallery. Not on the shankDate: 3/24/2010 9:45:29 PM
Author: NewGuy12
I have the CAD renderings but the renderings are going to be used to create the bulk, with the details excluded (to be done later by jewelers). For reference, the attached image is what the finished ring would look like along the circumference.
When you say milgrain, are you referring to the milgrain around the circumference of the gallery? That I notice. Or do you mean milgrain at some point around the 2 pointers?