Maisie
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2006
- Messages
- 12,598
Yes, it''s pathos in it''s basic form - what "we", as an audience, "feel" when "triumph" happens to "someone like ourselves" (Miss Boyle). Hence, the "tears" in this thread. Aristitle was no dummy.Date: 4/14/2009 3:48:57 PM
Author: TravelingGal
Good point LAJennifer. Ms. Boyle did move many people...I think many enjoy the ugly duckling story and want to see a swan. People will cheer for her and think she is magnificent not because of the technical qualities of her voice, but because within the first few notes of that song captured the human imagination.Date: 4/14/2009 3:43:00 PM
Author: LAJennifer
Musey - I understand what you are getting at - as I, too, enter the discussion with years of training, experience and a resume. Just about every performance I''ve seen on TV - I can always shrug my shoulders and say I''ve seen/heard better. but that kind of sucks the fun out of entertainment. Clearly, Miss Boyle ''moved'' people (who cares about us technical pros) - as evidenced in this here thread and all over the web for that matter. And isn''t that the point of ''art''? Aristotle''s Poetics - why we go to the theatre. Need I say more?
SorryDate: 4/14/2009 3:54:23 PM
Author: decodelighted
How''s this for communicating: Stop Sucking The Fun Out Of My Entertainment! You got your snark in my Poetics. No, YOU got your Poetics in *my* snark. Infernal circle. Blerg.
Musey, you know I love you ... I''m mostly kidding! But LAJennifer really hit it ... it IS a buzzkill to hear the detailed analysis of why what was so moving isn''t so amazing afterall. Its like spoiling a magic trick. Or dissecting a joke. Its what I said before: Inside Baseball. Not saying you don''t have the right to post whatever you like ... just saying why that kinda talk irks *me*.Date: 4/14/2009 3:58:02 PM
Author: musey
SorryDate: 4/14/2009 3:54:23 PM
Author: decodelighted
How''s this for communicating: Stop Sucking The Fun Out Of My Entertainment! You got your snark in my Poetics. No, YOU got your Poetics in *my* snark. Infernal circle. Blerg.discussing this kind of stuff is ''fun'' (mostly INTERESTING) for my circle, so I forget that it''s just a buzzkill for others.![]()
Bye now...
Nope. Been awhile since I had to read ethos/pathos blah blah blah.Date: 4/14/2009 3:57:34 PM
Author: LAJennifer
Yes, it''s pathos in it''s basic form - what ''we'', as an audience, ''feel'' when ''triumph'' happens to ''someone like ourselves'' (Miss Boyle). Hence, the ''tears'' in this thread. Aristitle was no dummy.Date: 4/14/2009 3:48:57 PM
Author: TravelingGal
Good point LAJennifer. Ms. Boyle did move many people...I think many enjoy the ugly duckling story and want to see a swan. People will cheer for her and think she is magnificent not because of the technical qualities of her voice, but because within the first few notes of that song captured the human imagination.Date: 4/14/2009 3:43:00 PM
Author: LAJennifer
Musey - I understand what you are getting at - as I, too, enter the discussion with years of training, experience and a resume. Just about every performance I''ve seen on TV - I can always shrug my shoulders and say I''ve seen/heard better. but that kind of sucks the fun out of entertainment. Clearly, Miss Boyle ''moved'' people (who cares about us technical pros) - as evidenced in this here thread and all over the web for that matter. And isn''t that the point of ''art''? Aristotle''s Poetics - why we go to the theatre. Need I say more?
Date: 4/14/2009 2:14:04 PM
Author: TravelingGal
Date: 4/14/2009 2:10:36 PM
Author: decodelighted
At the risk of seeming pedantic....it frustrates me that professionally trained singers seem to think the single definition of ''great singer'' is technical proficiency. All that talk is ''inside baseball'' ... and a little besides the point when it comes to talent competitions. Maybe those with training wish for a world where technical proficiency is king (looks, story, personality, charisma, facial expressions, soul, resonance, etc --be damned). But its simply NOT that important ... when it comes to performance as a business & sales & *real life*.
You can learn to sing. But you can''t learn to *be remarkable*. It must be maddening.
Can people really ''learn'' to sing if they are hopeless? I''ve always wondered. I can''t imagine myself ever getting anything more than one octave range...which is fine for nursery songs anyway.![]()
Aw bee.Date: 4/14/2009 4:07:04 PM
Author: bee*
Date: 4/14/2009 2:14:04 PM
Author: TravelingGal
Date: 4/14/2009 2:10:36 PM
Author: decodelighted
At the risk of seeming pedantic....it frustrates me that professionally trained singers seem to think the single definition of ''great singer'' is technical proficiency. All that talk is ''inside baseball'' ... and a little besides the point when it comes to talent competitions. Maybe those with training wish for a world where technical proficiency is king (looks, story, personality, charisma, facial expressions, soul, resonance, etc --be damned). But its simply NOT that important ... when it comes to performance as a business & sales & *real life*.
You can learn to sing. But you can''t learn to *be remarkable*. It must be maddening.
Can people really ''learn'' to sing if they are hopeless? I''ve always wondered. I can''t imagine myself ever getting anything more than one octave range...which is fine for nursery songs anyway.![]()
I could never learn to sing. They used to sit me in the corner in primary school with my colouring books while everyone else sang away as I used to put everyone else off tuneThen I went to a secondary school where we had choir practice three times a week (mandatory) and even that didn''t help me.![]()
Interesting. I only watched one season of idol (I watched because we had in idol product at work and I couldn''t pitch it without understanding the show). Haven''t seen it since. However I think I probably could watch Britain''s Got Talent...I like that they don''t seem to have an age max?Date: 4/14/2009 4:15:14 PM
Author: decodelighted
And like magic Gawker weighs in on the 5 types of people who watch American Idol. (A show arguably similar to the one we''re discussing in this thread).
Date: 4/14/2009 4:07:04 PM
Author: bee*
I could never learn to sing. They used to sit me in the corner in primary school with my colouring books while everyone else sang away as I used to put everyone else off tuneThen I went to a secondary school where we had choir practice three times a week (mandatory) and even that didn't help me.![]()
Date: 4/14/2009 4:02:06 PM
Author: decodelighted
Musey, you know I love you ... I'm mostly kidding! But LAJennifer really hit it ... it IS a buzzkill to hear the detailed analysis of why what was so moving isn't so amazing afterall. Its like spoiling a magic trick.
Date: 4/14/2009 4:12:23 PM
Author: TravelingGal
Aw bee.Date: 4/14/2009 4:07:04 PM
Author: bee*
Date: 4/14/2009 2:14:04 PM
Author: TravelingGal
Date: 4/14/2009 2:10:36 PM
Author: decodelighted
At the risk of seeming pedantic....it frustrates me that professionally trained singers seem to think the single definition of ''great singer'' is technical proficiency. All that talk is ''inside baseball'' ... and a little besides the point when it comes to talent competitions. Maybe those with training wish for a world where technical proficiency is king (looks, story, personality, charisma, facial expressions, soul, resonance, etc --be damned). But its simply NOT that important ... when it comes to performance as a business & sales & *real life*.
You can learn to sing. But you can''t learn to *be remarkable*. It must be maddening.
Can people really ''learn'' to sing if they are hopeless? I''ve always wondered. I can''t imagine myself ever getting anything more than one octave range...which is fine for nursery songs anyway.![]()
I could never learn to sing. They used to sit me in the corner in primary school with my colouring books while everyone else sang away as I used to put everyone else off tuneThen I went to a secondary school where we had choir practice three times a week (mandatory) and even that didn''t help me.
I wonder if these people knew they quashed any chance we had to sing. I LOVED to sing as a child. I was in choir and sang my heart out. A girl (who could sing quite well) turned to me when the song was over and snidely (at least in my poor little mind) said, ''You were off key!''![]()
I''ve lip synched ever since, except when hanging out with the mold in my shower or trying to torture my own child.![]()
So with that I say, GO MS. BOYLE! Sing to the heavens on behalf of us who could only dream of it!![]()
Date: 4/14/2009 4:23:18 PM
Author: VRBeauty
Date: 4/14/2009 4:07:04 PM
Author: bee*
I could never learn to sing. They used to sit me in the corner in primary school with my colouring books while everyone else sang away as I used to put everyone else off tuneThen I went to a secondary school where we had choir practice three times a week (mandatory) and even that didn''t help me.![]()
Bee* and T-Gal: I''m so sorry your singing was rejected!You''ve reminded me of one of my all-time favorite NPR stories, one I heard (and remember!) from probably 10-20 years ago. It was about a young woman who loved to sing, but literally could not carry a tune. She was utterly tone-deaf. So.. she found other people in the same predicament, and they got together once a month and sang their hearts out! The story included a sound clip, of course, and the group singing did nothing to improve anybody''s tunefulness
.![]()
As one who shares the need to sing, this story will always remain close to my heart.
BTW... not to stray into forbidden areas, but the injunction is to ''make a joyful noise,'' not to make a ''perfect'' noise!
Date: 4/14/2009 2:45:54 PM
Author: Gypsy
I was in chior for years, formal voice coach, and I got solo parts for our performances.
...
One of the other girls in my choir was an alto when she first joined. And she had a nice voice but didn''t get solos and so forth. I don''t recall how it came about, but I gave her the name for my vocal coach and ... after a few lessons. OMFG. Our coach ''uncovered'' her true voice. And it was the voice of an angel. Literally. So pure, so strong, and so humbling and her range... crimney. I have chills just remembering her performances-- not just her first one... but everyone thereafter as well.
...
She had something god given, a talent that was so amazing and wonderful. And no, she didn''t have the training I did, or the years invested but she had ''it'' and everyone who heard her sing knew it.
...
Some people have ''it'' some people ''don''t'' ....