lilythespitfire|1313521590|2992025 said:I need to decide if I want a very thin (1.5mm) shank or just thin (2mm) for a stone that's 2.8 carats. I love the look of thin metal and want to see if those who do have that type of rock and shank have been happy with it and haven't had any structural problems.
Thanks in advance!!!
Yssie|1313527590|2992104 said:lilythespitfire|1313521590|2992025 said:I need to decide if I want a very thin (1.5mm) shank or just thin (2mm) for a stone that's 2.8 carats. I love the look of thin metal and want to see if those who do have that type of rock and shank have been happy with it and haven't had any structural problems.
Thanks in advance!!!
I would absolutely NOT do a sub-2mm shank, especially if you choose the softer platinum and Swiss cheese it with pave. Unless you plan to wear it once in a blue moon, perhaps.
This How Thin Can You Go trend is getting utterly ridiculous, in my not-so-humble opinion. Any round metal wire - cast or hand-forged or dropped straight from the heavens - will be stronger if there's more of it, and will withstand the pressures of daily wear if there's more of it spread horizontally across your finger. If you want the aesthetic of a thin band try a knife edge - they "look" thinner, but there's plenty of metal hiding in the design.
bean|1313533558|2992186 said:This is a picture I've already posted.. but...
3.18 ct with about a 1.7-1.8mm band.
It makes the diamond look huge. And excuse the puffy fingers. They did not size the ring correctly and it was a bit tight!
MissGotRocks|1313534320|2992191 said:bean|1313533558|2992186 said:This is a picture I've already posted.. but...
3.18 ct with about a 1.7-1.8mm band.
It makes the diamond look huge. And excuse the puffy fingers. They did not size the ring correctly and it was a bit tight!
Your diamond is HUGE Bean! Got any side profile pics of your ring? Would love to see them!!
gemgirl|1313530248|2992139 said:2mm is about as thin as I would go for that size stone. That's pretty big. Honey, how many upgrades did you get? Didn't you have a one carat or a little over when you got engaged? More power to you!
bean|1313536292|2992217 said:MissGotRocks|1313534320|2992191 said:bean|1313533558|2992186 said:This is a picture I've already posted.. but...
3.18 ct with about a 1.7-1.8mm band.
It makes the diamond look huge. And excuse the puffy fingers. They did not size the ring correctly and it was a bit tight!
Your diamond is HUGE Bean! Got any side profile pics of your ring? Would love to see them!!
I think our rings were very similar in the past! Mine use to be a 3 stone...
.72 - 3.18 - .74
2.3-2.8mm shank I believe .
When I switched it to a solitaire from a 3 stone, the center looked HUGE and the thinner band only helps that.
OP, are you thinking of side stones at all?
Here was my mock-up with a hair binder around it to "look like" a solitaire before it was one.
WOWSA. I love that band with it.bean|1313535534|2992208 said:7.25 is my normal size.. but I think they made it a 6.5. I have lost a bit of weight since then so it's a little looser but a 7 would be way better. My hands have not swelled as much as they used to! I guess my fingers are making way for the ring (haha)
Here is a side pic. It's a temp ring (my ring sagaaaaa) but I am enjoying it right now. It's very durable!
It's 14k wg and has not been bent out of shape or out of round. Personally, I wouldn't go thinner than this.
I think this pic is from last spring...
eta: I swear my rings don't usually look so tight! Looks way worse up close.
Snooper|1313623804|2992944 said:Here's my ER (old pic), the band is 1.7-1.8mm Leon, and I've had it for 7 years? Never bent out of shape.
Edit: 3.10 center, size 7 for reference.
Snooper|1313623804|2992944 said:Here's my ER (old pic), the band is 1.7-1.8mm Leon, and I've had it for 7 years? Never bent out of shape.
Edit: 3.10 center, size 7 for reference.