JerseyGrl81
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2008
- Messages
- 371
I agree with lbbaber. I'm not really a halo fan anymore (I once was, though!) but your wedding band looks SO nice next to that plain shank.lbbaber|1302018904|2888266 said:I actually prefer the halo, and NOT because I am a halo-girl (although I clearly am) but bc the plain shank of the halo looks GORGEOUS against your wedding band!!
It's just enough. It makes your diamond really pop AND it makes the wedding band shine too. It's like they are both shown off better some how with the halo setting.
Not to say that your current setting isnt pretty too BUT with the wedding band, I prefer the halo. It's gorgeous. If you were planning on wearing the e-ring alone, I would say keep the current setting.
dreamingoftacori|1302054157|2888821 said:I'm sooo bias on this so that's my warning!
I think your set is beautiful the way it is, however the prongs as mentioned are very prominent. As for the halo, I LOVE LOVE the plain shank halo look with an eternity band. In fact, it's what i'm going to do exactly! I have the Tacori 2639 which is the 2620 with a round halo instead of the cushion in the 2620. I think that the other one you posted is an obvious take on the Tacori and if you really love it, then go with the original.
Here is a link to my post:
[URL='https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/my-tacori-2639rd-plain-shank-halo-engagement-ring.158675/']https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/my-tacori-2639rd-plain-shank-halo-engagement-ring.158675/[/URL]
You can see in the photos I posted that my prongs are made to be more "claw" and invisible versus the thicker ones you may see in other Tacori rings on display. So it may be something to consider if you don't want them to be too visible.
anitabee|1302135120|2889673 said:i very much like your ring exactly as it is! don't change a thingi think in the end you may regret it.