Kelli
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- May 27, 2008
- Messages
- 5,455
Date: 4/17/2009 3:05:07 PM
Author: purrfectpear
Let this be a lesson to the Tiffany supporters who encourage everyone to ''buy Tiffany''.![]()
There are many women who would much prefer a larger stone for the same money. Think about that next time a guy says ''what should I do''.
Agreed, Octavia. If you go back and read her Fi''s thread, it was her emotional reaction to putting on the T&Co ring that helped him decided what to buy. Nearly everyone who first responded to his thread said that they would go for the larger stone rather than the brand. Only a couple of posters said to go with Tiffany because of the brand name. Even ''Tiffany supporters'' said to go with the larger stone. It wasn''t until people read that her face lit up upon trying on a ring at T&Co that the tone of the thread changed.Date: 4/17/2009 4:13:07 PM
Author: Octavia
Date: 4/17/2009 3:05:07 PM
Author: purrfectpear
Let this be a lesson to the Tiffany supporters who encourage everyone to ''buy Tiffany''.![]()
There are many women who would much prefer a larger stone for the same money. Think about that next time a guy says ''what should I do''.
I''m not a Tiffany supporter or a detractor -- I think it''s got its place, and like anything else in life, there are some people who love Tiffany and some who don''t, and there are some pros and cons to buying there or anywhere else. If anything, though, this should be a lesson to guys about to propose, that they should get input from their girlfriend on what she wants before making a final decision, because it''s as emotional for her as it is for him. Letting the person who will be wearing it for the rest of her life have a say in it gives the best chance of both people being happy with the finished product. This could easily have been a thread that went the other way if the OP had gotten the bigger ring but wanted the Tiffany brand. You''re absolutely right that there are many women who prefer a larger stone for the same money, but there''s no need to bash people for preferring one company over another.
Date: 4/16/2009 8:59:58 PM
Author: FrekeChild
First, breathe.
Second, 1.41ct is very respectable.
Date: 4/16/2009 10:54:09 PM
Author: LaraOnline
I just don''t get it. Perhaps it is because I am ''intrinsically cool''![]()
At this point, maybe it would be OK to return the ring and get something like the Whiteflash ACA equivalent, since you've already looked back and questioned the decision. I suggest, if you do go this route, that you, considering that you were involved in the first place, make this as painless as possible from here on out, surgical, if you will. I would be direct; I would be resolute; and then I would be effusively apologetic (but keep in mind point 2: resolute).Date: 4/16/2009 10:42:04 PM
Author: instantpig
I thought I would never fall prey to that, but that's easier said than done. It's the great Catch-22 of those schools - those who are there got there because they were never quite satisfied with where they were... but the irony is that very characteristic can also make them never satisifed with life. I guess it is wise to really think about where exactly the end point/goal is.
Date: 4/17/2009 3:05:07 PM
Author: purrfectpear
Let this be a lesson to the Tiffany supporters who encourage everyone to ''buy Tiffany''.![]()
There are many women who would much prefer a larger stone for the same money. Think about that next time a guy says ''what should I do''.
Sorry, Octavia. I agree with you on all accounts (which perhaps I didn''t word correctly in my post?). I think my eyes kind of glazed over the meat of your post and I focused on the last sentence which was what I was atually responding to.Date: 4/17/2009 5:16:21 PM
Author: Octavia
Sammyj, I think I worded my previous post a little incorrectly, but my basic point still stands. I meant that it''s important to tease out exactly what the most important factors are in ring-buying -- I just think that if the OP had the opportunity to tell him directly, ''I really do love the Tiffany ring but I''m afraid that I may regret not going with a larger stone, so I may need to wear it for a few days before I can really determine how I feel about it,'' then he would have known better what to expect and might not have been as bruised by the fact that it happened. And I say this as someone whose FI picked out the ring with no input from me at all, and also went to Tiffany, and I never traded it because his feelings mean more to me than a piece of jewelry. But if he''d asked me about it beforehand, I wouldn''t have felt bad being completely frank about my preferences. I didn''t love my ring at first, although I have come to love it and wear it all the time...I don''t blame the store, or its efficient marketing team, or our friends who have and love brand-name rings and probably swayed his choice of where to shop, though.
Date: 4/19/2009 9:34:37 AM
Author: Kellybell
Additionally, my advice is this - please don''t try to compete with these people. Many come from such ridiculous amounts of wealth that it is impossible to try to keep up.
Since everyone has spent so much time to read and offer advice, I wanted to follow up and let everyone know that I have read every single post on here and also give an update. Immediately after spending three hours on this forum on the night of this post, I spoke with my fiance and let him know that I felt like a jerk for hurting his feelings (that it was unintended) and that I will be keeping the original ring. I am really bad at telling "white lies," so while I couldn''t tell him that I had a complete change of mind and that I suddenly loved the ring, I did tell him that it was important to me as a symbol of his love. Being the great guy that he is, he was able to let it go right away and sounded relieved.Date: 4/17/2009 2:33:50 PM
Author: Balaban
Hi, I don''t post on Pricescope a lot but I wanted to respond to this topic. I hope I''m not beating a dead horse, but this is important to me because I so hate the idea of anyone feeling out of place or, heaven forbid, inadequate because of her background.
First of all, like some of the other posters on this thread, I went to an ivy league undergrad and an ivy league law school. I also grew up in circumstances most people would consider pretty affluent on the east coast, but my extended family lives in much more modest circumstances, and I think sometimes my cousins (with whom I am close) feel out of place at their schools and jobs, precisely because they have been so successful, but come from a different place than many of their fellow students and co-workers.
Some of the women I have known who own the largest e-rings (and I''m talking so many carats I have no idea how to even estimate their weight) opt to wear simple gold bands for every day. I have a friend who just married into incredible wealth, and she turned down an heirloom e-ring in her now-husband''s family, because she wanted to wear her e-ring every day and she didn''t feel like she needed anything that large. Which just goes to show that you never know, and that it''s not always the norm among those who have wealth to wear large(r) e-rings.
However, I have many high school, college, law school, and work friends (I work at a pretty high-end corporate law firm in NYC) who wear e-rings that have diamonds that are smaller than 1.41 carats. I would guess that the average among female attorneys at my law firm is 1.25-1.5 carats -- and these are women whose starting salaries are well into the 6 figures (not to mention their SO''s salaries). In some cases, this is because they got engaged before they had this kind of income, but the same if true when they have already accumulated some wealth.
The reason that I am sharing all of this is that, like others have said, I don''t think you should in any way feel like a 1.41 carat e-ring is ''small'' for an ivy league b-school. Of couse some people will wear larger stones, and if it makes them happy and works with their lifestyle and their finances, that is great. But I genuinely do not think that e-rings so much bigger than 1.41 -- enough bigger that they would dwarf it in a comparison -- are the majority at either ivy business schools or in midtown/wall street banks and firms. The same is true for women on the (wealthy) Upper East Side of Manhattan -- some wear really large diamonds, some don''t. It''s a matter of choice and personal style as much as -- and in some cases more than -- wealth/education/what have you.
But most importantly, you should feel really, really great about the fact that you are going to such a wonderful b-school, especially in what was an extremely competitive admissions year. You got in, which means that you are just as smart and just as qualified to be there as any of the other students. And honestly if you don''t come from the same undergrad schools or the same part of the country as the bulk of them, if means you''re going to bring something new and valuable to the table in your classes.
I hope this wasn''t too long-winded or preachy. I echo what everyone else said re: your finace, etc, and know that whatever decision the two of you reach will be what is best for you as a couple, and as individuals.
Good luck at school next fall!
Yeah,,, that will be so Beautiful!...Date: 4/26/2009 4:43:41 PM
Author: instantpig
p.s. I will be addressing the ''uniqueness'' issue of the ring by getting an interesting wedding band as some people here have suggested. Maybe an alternating round-baguette eternity...![]()