Shallow Crown/Large table

[rhhgrhrthreh]

This diamond scores 1.1 on the HCA, and is AGS0 but I've seen a number of posts oppose crown angles less than 34, and most really don't like large tables which are close to 60/60. It is GIA ideal and AGS0 though so I'm confused as this is normally a good starting point for nice cuts.

The spec of this is as follows
1.07ct VS2 H Colour
Depth 59.9%
Table 59%
Crown Angle 32.5'
Pav Angle 41'

https://www.bluenile.com/diamond-details/LD09616457

Is this ok or should I look for more ideal proportions?

I'm a bit disheartened as it seems like its impossible to find a great diamond online. There is always an issue. I was looking at SI1 without an inclusion in the table, but then the two i found was advised against as there is a risk of chipping. I've had poor ideal scopes, cloudy diamonds returned, the list goes on.

The wealth of information online has clearly made me too picky

 

[MarionC]

Don’t give up. It’s hardly impossible...in fact I have the opposite problem!
I know you will get great advice here and find something wonderful.

 

[OoohShiny]

I would have to ask @Garry H (Cut Nut) to confirm for sure, but my understanding is that the HCA tool is to confirm that the angles of the pavilion and crown are complementary - and the lower crown and steeper pavilion here would seem to 'match' each other, giving the HCA score under 2. A higher crown would, therefore, require a shallower pavilion.

As for whether one prefers a larger table and lower crown (and the reduced fire it might bring) over a higher crown and smaller table is down to a matter of taste, but I don't think the stone above would meet PS-recommended standards.