piccolascimmia
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2006
- Messages
- 342
Hi all,
Thanks for the help so far (and sorry for the long thread below), now I'm a bit paralyzed between 2 types of settings for the 1.29 asscher my fabulous bf just bought yesterday (see here). Its going to the appraiser, but I'll post more photos when (if) he lets me see it next.
In the meantime, I'm driving myself crazy between 2 types of setting for the ring. I've tried to map out my thoughts/questions below and would love to hear others feedback on your experience with any of these settings.
1) Cartier Reproduction Style
Winfield's example i like best, but can't imagine what type of band would look good - I like matchy-matchy I emailed Wink to find out what they can do. Winfield link
2nd best, and I'd ask WF to figure out how to modify the ring to allow a custom flush band WF link
3rd best (I'd do this in a heartbeat, since it has both ring and band, but I wouldnt feel comfortable wearing the band alone because of the feature to have the rings fit flush): BTD link
2) 1/2 - 3/4 eternity set
SP option 1 - do they have a matching band? and can they do claw prongs? Signed Pieces 1
Or this option if they can do claw prongs and could make it slightly thinner than 3.3? SP 2 Link
For this WF piece, I've contacted them to find out the cost to modify it to be 3/4, with claw prongs - but what's up with the 'hollow' look under the ring? I will ask when I talk to WF tomorrow WF Pave
And finally, i've also asked them the same as above for this one - 3/4, claw prongs WF Eternity
I think I have a pretty good idea of what I like (claw prongs, flush fit/matching diamond band), but just cant seem to figure out which one is 'the one'. And I'm slightly torn between the delicacy of pave, and getting something stronger on the band - channel or shared prong set.
Help!
TIA,
Marylee
Thanks for the help so far (and sorry for the long thread below), now I'm a bit paralyzed between 2 types of settings for the 1.29 asscher my fabulous bf just bought yesterday (see here). Its going to the appraiser, but I'll post more photos when (if) he lets me see it next.
In the meantime, I'm driving myself crazy between 2 types of setting for the ring. I've tried to map out my thoughts/questions below and would love to hear others feedback on your experience with any of these settings.
1) Cartier Reproduction Style
Winfield's example i like best, but can't imagine what type of band would look good - I like matchy-matchy I emailed Wink to find out what they can do. Winfield link
2nd best, and I'd ask WF to figure out how to modify the ring to allow a custom flush band WF link
3rd best (I'd do this in a heartbeat, since it has both ring and band, but I wouldnt feel comfortable wearing the band alone because of the feature to have the rings fit flush): BTD link
2) 1/2 - 3/4 eternity set
SP option 1 - do they have a matching band? and can they do claw prongs? Signed Pieces 1
Or this option if they can do claw prongs and could make it slightly thinner than 3.3? SP 2 Link
For this WF piece, I've contacted them to find out the cost to modify it to be 3/4, with claw prongs - but what's up with the 'hollow' look under the ring? I will ask when I talk to WF tomorrow WF Pave
And finally, i've also asked them the same as above for this one - 3/4, claw prongs WF Eternity
I think I have a pretty good idea of what I like (claw prongs, flush fit/matching diamond band), but just cant seem to figure out which one is 'the one'. And I'm slightly torn between the delicacy of pave, and getting something stronger on the band - channel or shared prong set.
Help!

TIA,
Marylee