Hi everyone,
I have been lurking on this forum for a while (and completely ignoring my "real" job) and have learned so much. I just got engaged (on top of the Eiffel tower of all places!) and have been ring shopping...no, ring researching. I found a couple of stones and am not sure which is the better one to go with. While neither are "Asschers" by brand, both fit the profile of what I''ve read about Asschers. One is a square emerald and the other is a cut corner square step cut (I was all set to go with the former but I stumbled across the latter yesterday and am now trying to figure out which is better...without seeing them side by side).
My big question regards settings. I like things that are simple, classic, and elegant. Nothing frilly here (and yes, some call it boring, but "classic" sounds so much nicer
I have seen a lot of pictures of just the ring but I find it impossible to tell without seeing it on a hand, preferably mine but I don''t think that''s going to happen.
So, does anyone have thoughts on asschers with either a) tapered baguettes, b) step cut trapezoids, c) both baguettes and trapezoids, or d) just solitaire (maybe an x-prong or I like the sholdt solitaire design (from what little I know)). Again, something very simple, no prongs sticking out, fluid lines, etc
I will try attach some pictures, a few of which I am sure I got from this site (if I can figure out how). They are someone else''s gorgeous ring, no copyright infringement here!
Does this make sense? Does anyone have advice or pictures?
(I should add that I am looking for white gold and the stone is about .90 - 1.00 carat and my finger is about a size 4.5).
Everyone has such amazing knowledge here and I would really appreciate anyone''s opinion. Also, if you have thoughts on how to choose between the two stones, I''m totally stuck on that too!!
thank you so much! Cheers to all
(couldn''t figure out how to attach more than one pic...I''ll keep trying...sorry)

I have been lurking on this forum for a while (and completely ignoring my "real" job) and have learned so much. I just got engaged (on top of the Eiffel tower of all places!) and have been ring shopping...no, ring researching. I found a couple of stones and am not sure which is the better one to go with. While neither are "Asschers" by brand, both fit the profile of what I''ve read about Asschers. One is a square emerald and the other is a cut corner square step cut (I was all set to go with the former but I stumbled across the latter yesterday and am now trying to figure out which is better...without seeing them side by side).
My big question regards settings. I like things that are simple, classic, and elegant. Nothing frilly here (and yes, some call it boring, but "classic" sounds so much nicer
I have seen a lot of pictures of just the ring but I find it impossible to tell without seeing it on a hand, preferably mine but I don''t think that''s going to happen.
So, does anyone have thoughts on asschers with either a) tapered baguettes, b) step cut trapezoids, c) both baguettes and trapezoids, or d) just solitaire (maybe an x-prong or I like the sholdt solitaire design (from what little I know)). Again, something very simple, no prongs sticking out, fluid lines, etc
I will try attach some pictures, a few of which I am sure I got from this site (if I can figure out how). They are someone else''s gorgeous ring, no copyright infringement here!
Does this make sense? Does anyone have advice or pictures?
(I should add that I am looking for white gold and the stone is about .90 - 1.00 carat and my finger is about a size 4.5).
Everyone has such amazing knowledge here and I would really appreciate anyone''s opinion. Also, if you have thoughts on how to choose between the two stones, I''m totally stuck on that too!!
thank you so much! Cheers to all
(couldn''t figure out how to attach more than one pic...I''ll keep trying...sorry)
