jgny
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
- Messages
- 310
JDate: 4/16/2010 8:37:18 AM
Author: jgny
Found it! It''s blue nile! I never think to look at them b/c they are a bit pricier.
Jgny,Date: 4/17/2010 8:59:10 AM
Author: jgny
Hi Charmy, Lorelei and CCL!
Tks for the heads-up on adiamor!
I''ve contacted the rec. vendors here and the challenge is that the size stone (4-5 ct) that I want isn''t in my price range (~60) with the clarity I was looking at (G VS1).So rather than peppering them with questions, I wanted to search and play around with color/clarity and see what it gets me. Was particularly inspired after I saw the recent 5 ct Leon J color cushion. And of course when I searched my usual sites I couldn''t search by l/w and didn''t want to wade thru anything over 1.05.![]()
Not looking to make things hard for myself at all - it''s frustrating b/c i *think* the right stone is out there but when it will pop up, I don''t know. As I understand it, there are only 2 (wholesale) cutters who supply the vintage look that I want. I''ve considered broadening my search to include vintage/antique stones but most of the time they are set and I can''t evaluate them out of the setting.
I have a feeling this may be a long journey.
In 4 - 5 carat stones it makes no sense for a cutter to lose weight just to try to optimize the light return unless its selected for a branded line like the AVC. The commerical balance of lightreturn/weight which dictates the cutting stratgey would favour weight retention, the rough is so expensive losing 0.25ct of final diamond weight is thousands of dollars.Date: 4/17/2010 11:33:00 PM
Author: jgny
CCL - I have your cushion guide bookmarked! I refer to it almost daily (I am not kidding!)
Can you explain your last sentence 'addition careful attention to rough weight retention is crucial in stones of that size so you will almost never see as optimized a design as in the lower weights' - I read it a couple of times and maybe it's a long day but I'm not sure I totally understand it... do you mean larger sizes are more cut for weight than for beauty?
What has been bothering me about the cushions I've seen - the light loss versus that of a RB.
First, the culet, and how it reflects in all the different facets. I love the deep flashes of a old mine cut but the reflection of the culet (especially when they are large) creates these little black holes where light does not reflect back.
Also, sometimes I see a slight donut in these stones, for example this (non AVC) cushion from GOG:
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/5723/
the DiamXray shows a donut like light leakage. I've been told that some light leakage will happen in a cushion b/c it's the nature of it and also the reflection of the culets.
This is often the case particularly with the heavier weight diamonds of any shape, the priority of the cutter is to plan to get the maximum amount of finished stone out of the rough, cutting for the best optical performance can shave off considerable weight and have a major impact on profit.Date: 4/17/2010 11:33:00 PM
Author: jgny
do you mean larger sizes are more cut for weight than for beauty?