Scrutinize this RADIANT!

[petrock<3]

Specs:

1.54 carats

E color

SI 1

7.04 x 6.53 x 4.14

1.08 ratio

Table 65 %
Traditional Depth 63.4 %

Radiant Specifics:

visible surface area : 42.95
adjusted depth: 60.6 %
Adjusted crown height: 11.2 %
adjusted pavilion depth: 47.0 %

 

[petrock<3]

hand shot

 

[petrock<3]

any thoughts appreciated!

 

[loveloveloveit]

to my untrained eye it doesn''t look like there is anytthing to scrutinise, it looks fabulous (i''m no good with the numbers mind you). gorgeous!

 

[petrock<3]

loveloveloveit- great screen name BTW- thank you. It was purchased three years ago, and although I did some research on pricescope, I never asked anyone if it was a good choice.

It would be good to know, and if it is not a good stone, I would appreciate the honesty! I may upgrade it to a yellow diamond or reset this one in a halo. Currently on the fence about it!

 

[anitabee]

that is seriously GORGEOUS! i LOVE the crisp, blue-whiteness! AWESOME!

(mind you, i know nothing, technically, about radiants. just know it''s beautiful esp with that setting)

 

[petrock<3]

Thanks anitabee!

 

[jan can]

Beautiful ring. I have no technical knowledge so can only comment on what I see. It is beautiful. I''d love to own it.

 

[iota15]

From the pictures, it looks like a beautiful radiant - which is really the most important thing.

However, without even referencing the chart, I''ve looked at the AGA cut grade chart for radiants enough to know you''ve bought a 1A, or close to it. For whatever the chart stands for, it''s the only source that even purports to put any qualification numbers on a radiant - and on those grounds, it looks like you''ve got a winner too.

If you still love it, keep it.

 

[Lorelei]

It looks like a very nice radiant from what I can see, I can''t tell you much about it from basic photos but it does look like a pretty stone.

 

[petrock<3]

Thanks to everyone for your comments. I wish I had one of those ASET images.

Like alot of the discussion on here the past few days, it is hard to know if you got a good stone or not. I enjoy it regardless, it has alot of sparkle. When you spend so much money on something, you just don''t want to get a bad deal.

 

[Sizzle]

Date: 3/27/2010 9:19:13 PM
Author: petrock<3
loveloveloveit- great screen name BTW- thank you. It was purchased three years ago, and although I did some research on pricescope, I never asked anyone if it was a good choice.

It would be good to know, and if it is not a good stone, I would appreciate the honesty! I may upgrade it to a yellow diamond or reset this one in a halo. Currently on the fence about it!

Its beautiful. If you have had this for three years and enjoyed it, dont'' start getting so caught up in the numbers that you drive yourself crazy! I think the numbers are a good guideline to find a new stone, but you might drice yourself crazy evaluating stuff you already have, enjoy and love.

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 3/28/2010 10:44:50 AM
Author: petrock<3
Thanks to everyone for your comments. I wish I had one of those ASET images.

Like alot of the discussion on here the past few days, it is hard to know if you got a good stone or not. I enjoy it regardless, it has alot of sparkle. When you spend so much money on something, you just don''t want to get a bad deal.

I wouldn''t worry, it looks like a very nice radiant to me!

 

[petrock<3]

Good point Sizzle