Round Diamond - Help with ASET, IdealScope etc.

[Tsuska]

Could I pick at pricescope's community brain about this diamond. You guys definitely know more than I do. I don't really know how to judge or read the images below and I don't know if this is a good price.
I think this is a really good diamond. Not sure about value though, it is a bit pricey. (just under AUD $14K or $9100 USD with Google exchange rate - AUD is bad at the moment)

Lab: GIA

Carat: 1.09
Colour: F
Clarity: VS1
Triple Ex
Fluorescence: None

LxWxD: 6.63 x 6.59 x 4.08

Depth 61.6%
Table: 56%
CA: 34
PA 40.8
Girdle Med - Slightly Thick, 3.5%
Culet None

Star length: 50%
Lower Half: 80%
1. Dark Light, 2. Arrow 3. ASET, 4. Hearts 5. Ideal white 6. office light

 

[OoohShiny]

The ASET looks at first glance like it might have a ring of leakage under the table, but I think it's fine - the centre circle is lighter than the 'leakage', which suggests it is just an overexposed picture.

 

[Matthews1127]

The ASET looks at first glance like it might have a ring of leakage under the table, but I think it's fine - the centre circle is lighter than the 'leakage', which suggests it is just an overexposed picture.

I see the same thing. I agree it is likely overexposed, or tilted, slightly.
Overall, it looks very promising.

 

[lovedogs]

The ASET looks at first glance like it might have a ring of leakage under the table, but I think it's fine - the centre circle is lighter than the 'leakage', which suggests it is just an overexposed picture.

Yup, agreed.

 

[daisygrl]

IS and Aset images look great. H&A image not so much - not the greatest symmetry. Would recommend seeing the stone in person.The stone in images is tilted as well.

 

[Diamond_Hawk]

In any ASET what might, at first, appear to be leakage can simply be an over-exposed image - and that appears to be the case here.

Taking quality images is one of the trickiest parts of marketing diamonds online. If it is outsourced to a sloppy company or the in-house training is not done well, top light performing diamonds can look more mediocre (though the opposite is rarely true).

Trust the experts here to see you through these questions.

 

[Tsuska]

Thank you all very much! This has been very informative and helpful

 

[gm89uk]

Images are fine, no leakage. Great diamond, H&A images are also fine. Clefts due to longer LGF. It's not H&A but very good symmetry.

 

[flyingpig]

It is interesting to see a vendor providing the black "IS" image.

Opinion on interpreting idealscope images

so some of you may have seen my previous post, and I have received a couple of mixed opinions on the IS image of this particular 1.3 G VS2 . I’ve been reading and trying to interpret the ideal scope chart on the ideal scope (thanks Sledge and Karl) website and to my beginner eyes this image...

www.pricescope.com

See @Karl_K comment.