Round Brilliant: p[lease review information

[bgray]

Okay please give us your thoughts...

 

[bgray]

and

 

[bgray]

and

 

[bgray]

and

 

[bgray]

anyone....?

 

[bgray]

bumping...

GIA specs

9.07 by 9.10 by 5.56
2.83 carat
G
SI1
Cut Grade Excellent

D=61.2
T=58
Crown angle=35
crown height=15
pavilion angle=40.6
pavilion depth=43
star length=50%
lower half =80%
girdle=med to SL thick
culet=none

polish=excellent
symm=excellent
fluor=med blue

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 4/13/2010 8:13:41 AM
Author: bgray
bumping...

GIA specs

9.07 by 9.10 by 5.56
2.83 carat
G
SI1
Cut Grade Excellent

D=61.2
T=58
Crown angle=35
crown height=15
pavilion angle=40.6
pavilion depth=43
star length=50%
lower half =80%
girdle=med to SL thick
culet=none

polish=excellent
symm=excellent
fluor=med blue

Looks really good B, just check with Brian concerning the 40.6 pavilion whether this is in fact maybe a tad shallower than 40.6, just looks as if there might be the barest hint of obstruction from the images but it is probably not of concern, Brian will soon be able to advise!

 

[bgray]

Looks really good B, just check with Brian concerning the 40.6 pavilion whether this is in fact maybe a tad shallower than 40.6, just looks as if there might be the barest hint of obstruction from the images but it is probably not of concern, Brian will soon be able to advise![/quote]


Lorelei: they say it looks great. (as for the pavillion angle, the sarin says 40.6 and the GIA cert says 40.6 so thats probably the number) i plugged the specs into the cut advisor and it gets a 1. i think its probably okay....?

 

[stone-cold11]

Looks good then.

 

[Upgradable]

What are the unusual dark areas that appear at the end of the arrows in all of the pictures? I''d assume they were artifact except they are also apparent in the actual diamond picture.

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 4/13/2010 9:55:58 AM
Author: bgray
Looks really good B, just check with Brian concerning the 40.6 pavilion whether this is in fact maybe a tad shallower than 40.6, just looks as if there might be the barest hint of obstruction from the images but it is probably not of concern, Brian will soon be able to advise!

Lorelei: they say it looks great. (as for the pavillion angle, the sarin says 40.6 and the GIA cert says 40.6 so thats probably the number) i plugged the specs into the cut advisor and it gets a 1. i think its probably okay....?[/quote]
Then I would trust that opinion!!

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 4/13/2010 11:03:32 AM
Author: Upgradable
What are the unusual dark areas that appear at the end of the arrows in all of the pictures? I'd assume they were artifact except they are also apparent in the actual diamond picture.

Those are what clued me in to possible obstruction Uppy, those are "paddles" which some stones which are prone to obstruction can show in images such as IS.