Replacement Diamond - need your opinion

[stkit]

Thanks to this forum and the wonderful people that have helped me, I have sent my original diamond back and they have agreed to refund my money in full. That said, I have identifed 3 diamods as a possible replacement and need some expert advise as to which one is best. The 3 options are:

#1) Emerald cut, item #6417100 from www.usacerteddiamonds.com
$9,898.85
1.52 Cts.
GIA Certificate # 15019696
E Color
VS1 Clarity
8.02x5.74x3.83 mm
Depth 66.7 %
Table 63%
Girdle: STK – TK
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Very Good
Fluorescence: None
Culet: None
#2 Emerald Cut, item code #9202601 from www.whiteflash.com
$10,095.00
1.50 Cts.
GIA Certificate
F Color
VS2 Clarity
8.20x5.50x3.60 mm
Depth 65.5%
Table 62%
Girdle: M- STK
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Very Good
Fluorescence: None
Culet: None
#3 Emerald Cut, item # 149469 from www.diamond.com
$10,658.00
1.52 Cts.
GIA Cert # IE31067
F Color
VS2 Clarity
8.48x5.42x3.49 mm
Depth 64.4%
Table 67%
Girdle VTN-NON
Polish: Very good
Symmetry: Very Good
Fluorescence: none
Culet: None

Any opinions?

 

[f0rbidden]

I think, sight unseen and all that, I would choose #1
higher color AND clarity for less money.

#2 is a good choice, too, the table and depth % are in the low 60''s where, I guess, ''ideally'' they should be.

Do you have the ability to see any of them before you purchase? Can you ask the sellers to take a look at them and give you some input?

 

[XChick03]

I don''t really like the numbers on any of them. ECs aren''t really my thing, but I don''t think any of those would qualify as ideal or premium cuts because of the table/depth. This might help.

 

[f0rbidden]

According to some of the info, the table/depth on EC''s should be in the low 60''s - mine are in the 69-70 range and my stone is a stunner.
I think it''s a matter of personal preference.