Reached usage limit on HCA tool—can anyone look these up?

[cardinalsfan]

I don't recall using the HCA tool that many times, but it appears I've reached my usage limit. Would anyone be able to look these up? Thanks in advance!

1) 62.1%, 54.5%, 35.6, 40.2

2) 62.1%, 57%, 35.4, 40.5

3) 61.5%, 54.5%, 34.5, 40.9

 

[diamondseeker2006]

I haven't used it in awhile, but it's asking for weight, symmetry, and measurements in addition to those numbers you posted. Do you have the GIA report numbers? That's much easier.

I can tell you off hand that #3 has good numbers.

 

[cardinalsfan]

1) 5.01 weight, excellent symmetry, 62.1%, 54.5%, 35.6, 40.2

2) 4.4 weight, excellent symmetry, 62.1%, 57%, 35.4, 40.5

3) 4.13 weight, excellent symmetry, 61.5%, 54.5%, 34.5, 40.9

Thanks, @diamondseeker2006

 

[maryjane04]

I think you also need the measurements L x W x D

 

[cardinalsfan]

@maryjane04 it looks like they're optional

 

[maryjane04]

1. HCA 0.9
2. HCA 0.8
3. HCA 1.4

LOL hope I did it right? I didn't check the H&A box.

 

[cardinalsfan]

@maryjane04 thank you so much for your help! Very glad to know they all score under 2.

 

[diamondseeker2006]

Ha! I did choose the best one. Please note that often stones that score under 1 aren't always the best for a ring. So #3 is likely the best of these three for a ring.

 

[cardinalsfan]

@diamondseeker2006 yes, I have read on here about the potential obstruction issues. I'm leaning towards #3.