- Joined
- Apr 22, 2010
- Messages
- 1,640
bean|1342077282|3232740 said:It's not often that PS has true "firsts" on here but Ma'am, this is a true first (that I know of) regarding an RB to an OEC. Very cool and I can't wait for more pictures! I don't think I'd be brave enough to do mine though![]()
SandyCheeks|1342076952|3232739 said:Wow that is amazing! I recently asked Brian Gavin about cutting my stone, he estimated a 1ct loss. Off to email Ari!
Dreamer_D|1342111443|3232857 said:I do think it looks really cool and is a neat idea!
Before everyone rushes off to recut their Rbskeep in mind that this change is to the pavilion mostly (only? would love to know), which will be a different look from many classic old cuts that have higher crowns, smaller tables, and other features of true older cuts. Sandy, that is likely why Brian said a 1ct loss: He envisioned a total body makeover!
I would love to see more "after" photos Twosanguinehearts when you get a chanceI really love seeing how small changes can affect optics and patterning. I can't wait to hear your thoughts too!
twosanguinehearts|1341979767|3232167 said:TravelingGal|1341978628|3232163 said:twosanguinehearts|1341978119|3232156 said:bright ice|1341974276|3232095 said:Interesting! I could certainly see re-cutting a non-ideal cut stone to an OEC. Can't wait to know what you think when you see it.
I'm curious why the H&A part is so interesting - is there a reason that this typically isn't done or shouldn't be done? Excuse my ignorance - I know a bit about diamonds, but not enough about OECs to understand why H&A would make a difference vs. a regular RB.![]()
Probably because you've paid a premium for the H&A cut to begin with, that it's not usual for one to recut a well cut stone.
Ahh, I see - I guess I didn't really think about it that way, but that makes sense. While my stone was always really pretty, and I always loved seeing the H&A, I love the look of an OEC so much more. It just appeals to me! I don't plan on ever selling or resetting the stone, so I think I'll be happy with my decision.![]()
angietime|1342182681|3233205 said:Here's the only reason the industry doesn't recommend or do this often...OEC fall under the fancy diamond category, so the Rapsheet discount for them drops instantly once it is not considered a Round Brilliant.
Dreamer_D|1342111443|3232857 said:I do think it looks really cool and is a neat idea!
Before everyone rushes off to recut their Rbskeep in mind that this change is to the pavilion mostly (only? would love to know), which will be a different look from many classic old cuts that have higher crowns, smaller tables, and other features of true older cuts. Sandy, that is likely why Brian said a 1ct loss: He envisioned a total body makeover!
I would love to see more "after" photos Twosanguinehearts when you get a chanceI really love seeing how small changes can affect optics and patterning. I can't wait to hear your thoughts too!
diamondseeker2006|1342237879|3233639 said:Dreamer_D|1342111443|3232857 said:I do think it looks really cool and is a neat idea!
Before everyone rushes off to recut their Rbskeep in mind that this change is to the pavilion mostly (only? would love to know), which will be a different look from many classic old cuts that have higher crowns, smaller tables, and other features of true older cuts. Sandy, that is likely why Brian said a 1ct loss: He envisioned a total body makeover!
I would love to see more "after" photos Twosanguinehearts when you get a chanceI really love seeing how small changes can affect optics and patterning. I can't wait to hear your thoughts too!
Yes, people need to realize that this change was to a stone that was already ideal cut. So if a stone was badly cut from the start, it might need a recut to the crown as well and it could be a very different scenario. If Brian said a stone needed a 1 ct. loss to recut, then expect that much or more on an OEC recut from a rb.
I would think a change like this is more of a transitional look since the crown and table aren't being altered. But I love transitionals as well.
diamondseeker2006|1342237674|3233636 said:angietime|1342182681|3233205 said:Here's the only reason the industry doesn't recommend or do this often...OEC fall under the fancy diamond category, so the Rapsheet discount for them drops instantly once it is not considered a Round Brilliant.
Well, in actuality the AVR's at GOG sell for a nice price premium above regular rb's, so I think it all depends on the quality of the recuts.
angietime|1342244360|3233674 said:diamondseeker2006|1342237674|3233636 said:angietime|1342182681|3233205 said:Here's the only reason the industry doesn't recommend or do this often...OEC fall under the fancy diamond category, so the Rapsheet discount for them drops instantly once it is not considered a Round Brilliant.
Well, in actuality the AVR's at GOG sell for a nice price premium above regular rb's, so I think it all depends on the quality of the recuts.
I love the vintage stones a lot more, but you don't think the industry as a whole excluding special cases like Good Old Gold generally would take a hearts and arrows as a specialty cut as well and find it easier to sell therefor less discounted? OEC and OM are a specialty item and even if they sell for above the advised price per ct, suppliers will not look at it quite the same way. I think in this case because both stones fall within the 2-2.50ct category it may never make a difference in resale value because it can always be recut back into a modern facetted stone, but aesthetic value is different than dollar value in this case. I think the recut looks wonderful...I personally am not a big fan of all H&A's myself.
Dreamer_D|1342238186|3233641 said:diamondseeker2006|1342237879|3233639 said:Dreamer_D|1342111443|3232857 said:I do think it looks really cool and is a neat idea!
Before everyone rushes off to recut their Rbskeep in mind that this change is to the pavilion mostly (only? would love to know), which will be a different look from many classic old cuts that have higher crowns, smaller tables, and other features of true older cuts. Sandy, that is likely why Brian said a 1ct loss: He envisioned a total body makeover!
I would love to see more "after" photos Twosanguinehearts when you get a chanceI really love seeing how small changes can affect optics and patterning. I can't wait to hear your thoughts too!
Yes, people need to realize that this change was to a stone that was already ideal cut. So if a stone was badly cut from the start, it might need a recut to the crown as well and it could be a very different scenario. If Brian said a stone needed a 1 ct. loss to recut, then expect that much or more on an OEC recut from a rb.
I would think a change like this is more of a transitional look since the crown and table aren't being altered. But I love transitionals as well.
Maybe not DS, in the pics it looks like the LGF are very very short. If they are shorter than 50% it won't look like the sort of tranny you love, jjc's for exmaple. Those guys have LGF that are really long, I bet closer to 70%! I think this stone will look like an OEC with a shallower crown. I would be super curious about how it looks, pity Ari is not a sarin/IS/ASET type of guy because inquiring minds want to know![]()
GreenBling|1342342380|3234213 said:Beautiful! I love symmetry and starting to appreciate bigger facets so I too am very interested to seeing more photos and hearing your feedback about its performance before and after. Btw, I think your diamond is now priceless because it is original and a creation of your ownyou should name your diamond.
GreenBling|1342693796|3236526 said:I'm day dreaming about recutting a 3.5 SI2 I good into a 3 VS1 F Ex![]()
GreenBling|1342693796|3236526 said:I'm day dreaming about recutting a 3.5 SI2 I good into a 3 VS1 F Ex![]()
@twosanguinehearts - mind if I asked how the price was determined for your recut?
diamondseeker2006 said:After talking with Jonathan, the diamond I was considering recutting is not a good candidate for an AVR. The one thing I learned from Jonathan is that if you are going to do it, do it right and end up with a well cut stone with good light performance. So I urge anyone thinking of recutting to at least talk to Jonathan because recutting without consideration of the amount of weight lost in order to end up with a well cut stone with great light performance would be a mistake, in my opinion.
After my vacation I am sending for an AVR to compare to my rb to see how I feel about them both before I make any decisions.