sunnyd
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2007
- Messages
- 7,353
Cushions and halos are also antiquey. Hey even YG and marquises are coming back around! Same with fashion...who brought back leg warmers?! I mean really.Date: 7/31/2008 12:33:54 PM
Author: GoingCrazy29
Man, now you are making me second guess myself.... I LOVE LOVE LOVE halos and have for years (even before they became so popular, same with cushion cuts) but never want my ring to be compared to a yellow gold marquis (at least the way I look at them now)...Date: 7/31/2008 1:13:30 AM
Author: glitterata
I love the look of halos (well, some halos, anyway), but they''re so popular that I bet you a nickel people will look back in ten years and say, ''Remember the late 2000s, when everyone had to have a halo around their diamond?'' Like the way marquises set in yellow gold were popular in the 1980s. I like marquises, and I like yellow gold, but they do look dated. So I guess it depends on whether you ever intend to change your setting/ upgrade your diamond, or whether you intend to keep this ring forever. If this is your forever ring, will you mind if people look at it in 20 years and think it''s very much of its time, very dated? (It wouldn''t bother me. I never look fashionable to begin with, I don''t mind looking dated, and I don''t care whether anybody else likes my taste. But I think there are a lot of people it would bother.) If you don''t mind upgrading, and you think your financial resources will grow to allow it, then go for the halo. If you don''t mind risking looking dated and you love halos, go for the halo. Otherwise, put the money into the center stone.
My FF and I have pretty much found the perfect 1.22 cushion cut with the perfect setting (micropave halo- although it is the TINIEST halo I could find, I want it to be tiny, classy, and delicate).
Now I''m wondering if I should just go with a solitaire because I never ever want to upgrade my ring (I''m sentimental and so is he).
Thoughts?! Advice?! HELP!![]()
