i''m curious to know what other people think: would you prefer a ring that was entirely paid for by your fiance or would you be willing to chip in to get something better?
as background, bf and i are planning on getting engaged by the end of this yr. since there are a number of things that are still up in the air, my bf is not exactly certain what his budget will be for the ring. in the past, i have offered to chip in to help since i have a bit of savings AND because i know i have somewhat discriminating tastes.
if it were up to him, he would get me the ring of my dreams the first time around, with no upgrades in the future. in the event that this is not feasible, it seems like he is coming around to the idea of my chipping in. i had previously suggested that we maximize the quality and size of the stone by putting it in a simpler, cheaper setting, which we would then replace at a later point in time (perhaps a 5 yr anniversary project). he did not like this idea as his vision is that the ring will remain intact...i assume for the duration of my life, haha. i have no problem chipping in as i figure that at some point, his money will be my money, and my money will be his money. i''m wondering what other people would prefer in a situation like this. (not exactly my situation as of yet because there is still a chance that things will fall into place and his budget will be enough to facilitate the ring of my dreams.)
as background, bf and i are planning on getting engaged by the end of this yr. since there are a number of things that are still up in the air, my bf is not exactly certain what his budget will be for the ring. in the past, i have offered to chip in to help since i have a bit of savings AND because i know i have somewhat discriminating tastes.
