Please share opinions on these EC diamonds

[Eland]

I only have the photo images of these stones and would like your feedback. These are all GIA certified stones.

1.0ct K VS2 66.4/64.0 Depth/Table


1.41ct K VS2 69.3/70.0 Depth/Table


1.52ct K SI1 67.2/65.0 Depth/Table


1.27 K VS2 67.6/68.0 Depth/Table

 

[diamondseeker2006]

#2 looks great to me, but I prefer tables under 65, personally. You will have a very large table on that stone, but the faceting looks very nice.

#1 may or may not be okay. Would need more pictures and ASETs would be nice on all. #3 is not clean enough. I wouldn't look at SI1 in an emerald cut. #4 is a maybe but need more images.

One bit of info you should always include when comparing stones is the diameter measurements. Size matters with emerald cuts because of their depth.

 

[Mayk]

I also like the look of #2. Nice steps. I also like the ratio. It looks like its around 1.25. I like it better than long and skinny or more rectangle in shape.

 

[Rockinruby]

I like # 2 as well. I would be curious to see more pics info on # 4. I would pass on #3.

 

[lambskin]

2

 

[Eland]

Thanks for the input. I was drawn to #2 and #4. I will see if I can get ASETS. In the meantime I am still looking for a suitable stone.

 

[Lookinagain]

I vote for #2 as well.

 

[Gypsy]

I like #2 and #3 but there is no way 3 is clean.