Please help - which one would you chose?

[Murray_A]

Hello Everyone:

I am new to this site, and I was wondering if you could provide your opinion or if your see any red flags for the three diamond options below. Could you also please let me know which stone will perform best in terms of brilliance? Is the faint fluorecence a big problem for option 3?


Thanks!

Option 1:

Cut = AGS ideal 0
Polish = Ideal
Symmetry = ideal
Depth = 62.60
Table = 56.4%
Girdle = Thin to medium, faceted
Crown angle = 35.8
Crown size = 15.6%
Pavilion = 43.2%
Pavilion angle = 40.9
clarity = VS2
Fluorescence = none
Girdle = medium to slightly thick, faceted 1.9% to 4.3%
Color H

Option 2:

Shape: Round
Carat weight: 1.51
Cut: Ideal
Color: H
Clarity: VS1
Certificate: GIA

Depth: 60.6%
Table: 58.0%
Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Excellent
Crown angle = 34.0
Crown size = 14.5%
Pavillion Angle = 40.6
Pavillion Size = 43.0%
Girdle: Medium to slightly thick, faceted (3.5%)
Culet: None
Fluorescence: None

Option 3:

Shape: Round
Carat weight: 1.53
Cut: Ideal
Color: H
Clarity: VS1
Certificate: GIA
Depth: 61.9%
Table: 58.0%
Crown angle = 35.0
Crown Size = 15.0%
Pavillion angle = 41.0
Pavillion = 43.5%
Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Excellent
Girdle: Medium to slightly thick, 3.5%
Culet: None
Fluorescence: Faint

 

[yssie]

faint fluor 99.999 likely not even visible. Do you have ISs for all three?

don't love the depth on #1-you're losing spread b/c of the depth, but it's not enough to be called a problem, just not ideal. won't hurt performance.

 

[Lorelei]

Idealscopes would definitely be needed also do you have the diameters for each diamond too please in MM?

ETA - the faint/ negligible fluorescence won't be an issue, you shouldn't even notice it.

 

[stone-cold11]

What are the lower half numbers?

#1''s angles are slightly out, the other 2 might be ok, idealscope images will tell more.