Please give me some help for two stone

[flystar168]

Hi everybody,

I am looking for a stone for my wife, I search two stone. they have the same Crown Angle 34.9 and Pavilion Angle 40.7. but still have some little different such as depth and table. so I did not how to select them. Please give me some help.

The 1st stone:
IS pic

info

 

[flystar168]

The 2nd stone

IS pic

info





how about the light performance and fire ?

 

[tyty333]

Call WF, have them pull the 2 stones and describe them to you.

Or, my other solution...go with the least expensive one. They are very similar and both have great images. At this point I can't tell you that one is markedly better then the other.

 

[CareBear]

They both look good. Since they are both H color, I would take the whiter one.

 

[flystar168]

Call WF, have them pull the 2 stones and describe them to you.

Or, my other solution...go with the least expensive one. They are very similar and both have great images. At this point I can't tell you that one is markedly better then the other.

Many thanks to tyty33. but they are the same price

 

[darkfury18]

stone 1 looks more symmetrical to me and is rounder based on the measurement.

 

[Dancing Fire]

Very well cut stones. Love the H VS2 combo. Flip a coin!...

 

[flystar168]

stone 1 looks more symmetrical to me and is rounder based on the measurement.

Many thanks to darkfury18

for the stone 1, The arrow also is symmetrical and beautiful,but the key to symbols is cloud and Crystal.
And for the stone 2, The arrow has some little no clean, but the key to symbols only is cloud.

So I am worry about impact of light return and fire because of the symbols. such as milky diamond

 

[MissGotRocks]

It would not be designated as a branded 'A Cut Above' stone if it were milky. They are both beautiful and you can't go wrong with either stone as long as they are eyeclean. Whiteflash will tell you anything you want to know about either stone.

 

[diamondseeker2006]

stone 1 looks more symmetrical to me and is rounder based on the measurement.

Many thanks to darkfury18

for the stone 1, The arrow also is symmetrical and beautiful,but the key to symbols is cloud and Crystal.
And for the stone 2, The arrow has some little no clean, but the key to symbols only is cloud.

So I am worry about impact of light return and fire because of the symbols. such as milky diamond

No, not true, both stones are totally round and symmetrical and will have ideal light return. Ask them to pull the stones and tell you which is cleanest with a 10x loupe, and ask if one is higher H color than the other. Those are the only factors which would differentiate these two stones. Otherwise, they are almost identical and would make a perfectly matched pair of diamond stud earrings.

 

[flystar168]

It would not be designated as a branded 'A Cut Above' stone if it were milky. They are both beautiful and you can't go wrong with either stone as long as they are eyeclean. Whiteflash will tell you anything you want to know about either stone.

thank you very much for your answer! I will contact with them

 

[flystar168]

How about the pavilion angle and crown angle combination?
because somebody said that 34-34.5 crow should have 40.8-40.9 pavilion and 34.5-35 crow should have 40.5-40.6.

Thanks again, the feedback has been awesome and I have learnt so much!

 

[flyingpig]

How about the pavilion angle and crown angle combination?
because somebody said that 34-34.5 crow should have 40.8-40.9 pavilion and 34.5-35 crow should have 40.5-40.6.

Thanks again, the feedback has been awesome and I have learnt so much!

Yes, in general, you want shallow/steep, steep/shallow, or mid/mid combo.
That strategy is used when buying a non-branded diamond and/or without ASET/IS images.
Having said that, 34.9/40.7 is just fine.

Like I mentioned in the other thread, the numbers are fine. Applying that on ACA stones is futile.

 

[flystar168]

How about the pavilion angle and crown angle combination?
because somebody said that 34-34.5 crow should have 40.8-40.9 pavilion and 34.5-35 crow should have 40.5-40.6.

Thanks again, the feedback has been awesome and I have learnt so much!

Yes, in general, you want shallow/steep, steep/shallow, or mid/mid combo.
That strategy is used when buying a non-branded diamond and/or without ASET/IS images.
Having said that, 34.9/40.7 is just fine.

Like I mentioned in the other thread, the numbers are fine. Applying that on ACA stones is futile.

oh, flyingpig, you are so warm heart. thank you very much again

 

[flystar168]

How about the pavilion angle and crown angle combination?
because somebody said that 34-34.5 crow should have 40.8-40.9 pavilion and 34.5-35 crow should have 40.5-40.6.

Thanks again, the feedback has been awesome and I have learnt so much!

Yes, in general, you want shallow/steep, steep/shallow, or mid/mid combo.
That strategy is used when buying a non-branded diamond and/or without ASET/IS images.
Having said that, 34.9/40.7 is just fine.

Like I mentioned in the other thread, the numbers are fine. Applying that on ACA stones is futile.

oh, flyingpig, you are so warm heart. thank you very much again

hi every one,

I got another stone, but they are also very similar, so plese give me some comment. thanks