shape
carat
color
clarity

Please comment on these two Tiffany diamonds

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

HappyFish

Rough_Rock
Joined
Oct 26, 2007
Messages
66
Both are RB

Diamond 1
1.3 ct
F VS2
Measurements 6.97x6.99x4.36
Fluorescence none
Cut excellent
Symmetry very good
Polish excellent
Total depth% 62.5%
Table% 55%
Crown height% 15.9%
Crown angel 34.8
Star length% 50%
Pavilion depth% 43%
Pavilion angel 40.7
Lower half length % 75%
Girdle medium to slightly thick
Girdle finish faceted
Culet none
Price $17700

Diamond 2
1.26 ct
F VS2

Fluorescence none
Cut excellent
Symmetry excellent
Polish excellent
Total depth% 61.7%
Table% 58%
Crown height% 15%
Crown angel 35.3
Star length% 50%
Pavilion depth% 43.2%
Pavilion angel 40.9
Lower half length % 80%
Girdle medium to slightly thick
Girdle finish faceted
Culet none
Price $18600

Which one would you prefer? Thanks in advance.
 

Garry H (Cut Nut)

Super_Ideal_Rock
Trade
Joined
Aug 15, 2000
Messages
18,483
I prefer the first. It is better than the other Tiffany stone proportions posted recently.
I would want to see the effect of the 75% LG facets on table darkness though. If the real # is 77% it will be fine, but if it was 72.6% then it might be a little dark.
 

HappyFish

Rough_Rock
Joined
Oct 26, 2007
Messages
66
Thank you very much for your input, Garry. I have been lurking here for a couple of weeks and value your expert opinions.

What do you mean by "75% LG facets on table darkness"? How do I get the real number?
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top